IBJNews

City to cut $20 million from most departments in 2012

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis will reduce its work force by 200 positions through attrition next year to help cut $20 million from non-public safety agencies in its 2012 budget.

The cuts were highlighted Thursday afternoon in a preview of the budget to be presented to the City-County Council on Monday. They result from a $19 million drop in income-tax revenue, relatively flat property taxes and increased costs for expenditures such as employee health care and fuel.

Mayor Greg Ballard called the roughly $1.1 billion budget the “tightest in years.”

The city will flat-line spending for public safety agencies such as the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, the Indianapolis Fire Department and the Sheriff’s Department. No police officers or firefighters will be laid off, and there will be a police recruit class, albeit a small one.

The city also plans to transfer $40 million from its downtown tax-increment financing district to the city-county budget, a move that city finance officials said won’t impact the district’s reserves or debt-coverage ratio.

Another $4 million will be transferred from the budget of the Capital Improvement Board to cover the cost of providing public safety for the 2012 Super Bowl.

While Ballard said the city faced a tough financial picture, he emphasized that Indianapolis has been spared the more dramatic cuts faced by cities such as Trenton, N.J., Cleveland and Memphis.

“We’ve been able to avoid dramatic [reductions] at this point,” Ballard said.

When pressed about cuts the city might see–other than personnel–Ballard and City Controller Jeff Spalding wouldn’t detail specifics, but said it’s left up to department managers to find efficiencies. They did, however, say the cuts would not make a noticeable impact on city services.

Ballard said there could be a “small degradation” in some services–for example, a phone call to a city agency might not be answered as quickly, but he underscored that city services “are better than they’ve ever been.”

The city projects revenue will remain flat in 2013 but will start to increase starting in 2014.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Freshman English
    Dear IBJ,
    Please send your editor to headline writing school. That headline doesn't even come close to meaning what you think it means.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT