IBJNews

Civic Theatre considering move to Carmel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Civic Theatre, one of the city’s oldest and largest cultural organizations, is considering a move to Carmel’s new performing arts center.

Civic informed its current host, Marian University, yesterday of pending negotiations with the Carmel Performing Arts Foundation. The north suburb is building a concert hall and 500-seat theater, both of which are expected to be complete in late 2010.

Civic and the Carmel foundation entered a 60-day negotiation period, and a decision will be made at the end of the two months, Civic Artistic Director Bob Sorbera said. “We don’t have any agreement with them at all. It’s really, really premature.”

University officials, however, believe those talks will be successful. “It’s a very, very, very good deal, and certainly not one Marian University’s in a position to counter at this point,” university spokeswoman Andrea Fagan said.

Steven Libman, executive director of the Carmel Performing Arts Foundation, was not available for comment before IBJ’s deadline this morning.

Civic’s potential move answers a question that’s been on the lips of local arts supporters since Carmel announced its plan to build the $80 million facility: What will the suburb take from the city?

With Civic, Carmel would get a theater group with a $1.5 million budget and more than $524,000 in annual ticket sales.

Civic’s audience is widely dispersed around the Indianapolis metro area, Sorbera said. That’s one of many factors the board of directors will have to weigh in a decision to move to Carmel. “We have so many things to consider.”
 
Indianapolis Civic Theatre began in 1915, and has been on the northwest side of the city since the 1970s. In 2004, Civic left Showalter Pavilion at the Indianapolis Museum of Art for Marian College.

Civic’s leaders had hoped to build a brand-new theater on Marian’s campus, but that plan never materialized. Instead, Civic made $2 million in improvements to the 400-seat theater in Marian Hall.

Sorbera said the $2 million investment covers Civic’s lease expense through 2012.

“It has served us well as an interim theater,” Sorbera said.

Civic uses a combination of amateur actors, technicians and professionals. It has 14 full-time and three part-time employees.

The theater’s presence has been good for Marian students, Fagan said. The university even created a minor degree program in technical theater.

Fagan said the university will likely book Marian Hall with its own programming and student productions. Despite gaining some performance space, university officials are apparently dismayed.

“If this does happen, it’s a really sad thing for Indianapolis,” Fagan said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not to mention - a slap in the face to both community theaters already based in Carmel - including at least one who thinks the new arts center is supposed to be it's "home" - I'm betting that won't happen if Civic moves up there!
  • I think this would be a really bad move for Civic, and a loss to Indianapolis. I don't think what Carmel is doing is actually an investment for the future.
  • Whether ICT is South or North of 96th what is most important is to keep the theater alive and vibrant. Carmel is an important cog in the growth of the metro area.
    • Now, for me it's good that Civic is moving to Carmel, but I think they need to check with their season ticket holders because like other comments say, some people might not want to have to drive all the way to Carmel to see Civic. It would be a shame if they moved to Carmel and then lost a lot of theatre-goers. But, we'll see what they decide.
    • Why only 60 days to negotiate? Did Kathleen McLaughlin ask who else Civic is talking to? Sounds like a reprieve for desperate Carmel (who is building a concert hall and not a theater---big difference) to compete against a private developer or something? That is a big question for a reporter to leave unanswered.
    • There goes "Indianapolis" Civic Theatre. We're south-siders. I hope Civic can find enough volunteers in Carmel because we won't be making the trek all the way to Carmel - and I'm sure many of our peers will agree.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT