IBJNews

Civic Theatre considering move to Carmel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Civic Theatre, one of the city’s oldest and largest cultural organizations, is considering a move to Carmel’s new performing arts center.

Civic informed its current host, Marian University, yesterday of pending negotiations with the Carmel Performing Arts Foundation. The north suburb is building a concert hall and 500-seat theater, both of which are expected to be complete in late 2010.

Civic and the Carmel foundation entered a 60-day negotiation period, and a decision will be made at the end of the two months, Civic Artistic Director Bob Sorbera said. “We don’t have any agreement with them at all. It’s really, really premature.”

University officials, however, believe those talks will be successful. “It’s a very, very, very good deal, and certainly not one Marian University’s in a position to counter at this point,” university spokeswoman Andrea Fagan said.

Steven Libman, executive director of the Carmel Performing Arts Foundation, was not available for comment before IBJ’s deadline this morning.

Civic’s potential move answers a question that’s been on the lips of local arts supporters since Carmel announced its plan to build the $80 million facility: What will the suburb take from the city?

With Civic, Carmel would get a theater group with a $1.5 million budget and more than $524,000 in annual ticket sales.

Civic’s audience is widely dispersed around the Indianapolis metro area, Sorbera said. That’s one of many factors the board of directors will have to weigh in a decision to move to Carmel. “We have so many things to consider.”
 
Indianapolis Civic Theatre began in 1915, and has been on the northwest side of the city since the 1970s. In 2004, Civic left Showalter Pavilion at the Indianapolis Museum of Art for Marian College.

Civic’s leaders had hoped to build a brand-new theater on Marian’s campus, but that plan never materialized. Instead, Civic made $2 million in improvements to the 400-seat theater in Marian Hall.

Sorbera said the $2 million investment covers Civic’s lease expense through 2012.

“It has served us well as an interim theater,” Sorbera said.

Civic uses a combination of amateur actors, technicians and professionals. It has 14 full-time and three part-time employees.

The theater’s presence has been good for Marian students, Fagan said. The university even created a minor degree program in technical theater.

Fagan said the university will likely book Marian Hall with its own programming and student productions. Despite gaining some performance space, university officials are apparently dismayed.

“If this does happen, it’s a really sad thing for Indianapolis,” Fagan said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not to mention - a slap in the face to both community theaters already based in Carmel - including at least one who thinks the new arts center is supposed to be it's "home" - I'm betting that won't happen if Civic moves up there!
  • I think this would be a really bad move for Civic, and a loss to Indianapolis. I don't think what Carmel is doing is actually an investment for the future.
  • Whether ICT is South or North of 96th what is most important is to keep the theater alive and vibrant. Carmel is an important cog in the growth of the metro area.
    • Now, for me it's good that Civic is moving to Carmel, but I think they need to check with their season ticket holders because like other comments say, some people might not want to have to drive all the way to Carmel to see Civic. It would be a shame if they moved to Carmel and then lost a lot of theatre-goers. But, we'll see what they decide.
    • Why only 60 days to negotiate? Did Kathleen McLaughlin ask who else Civic is talking to? Sounds like a reprieve for desperate Carmel (who is building a concert hall and not a theater---big difference) to compete against a private developer or something? That is a big question for a reporter to leave unanswered.
    • There goes "Indianapolis" Civic Theatre. We're south-siders. I hope Civic can find enough volunteers in Carmel because we won't be making the trek all the way to Carmel - and I'm sure many of our peers will agree.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

    2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

    3. Straight No Chaser

    4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

    5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

    ADVERTISEMENT