IBJNews

CNO Financial earnings fall on recapitalization charge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel-based CNO Financial Group on Monday reported a third-quarter loss of $5 million, or 2 cents a share, compared to a $179.5 million, or 61 cent-per-share, profit in the third quarter of 2011.

Earnings were hurt mostly by a $176.4 million after-tax charge related to refinancing of debt earlier this year.

Revenue rose to nearly $1.1 billion, up from $992.3 million in last year's third quarter.

“Our recently completed recapitalization further strengthened our balance sheet, while increasing financial flexibility and lowering our ongoing costs,” said CEO Ed Bonach in a prepared statement.

CNO, the parent of insurers Bankers Life, Washington National and Colonial Penn, had sales of $94 million, as measured in new annualized premiums, in the most recent quarter, an increase of 1 percent from the same time last year.

CNO’s biggest unit, Chicago-based Bankers Life, posted sales of $80.6 million versus $79.4 million in the quarter a year ago. Sales at Washington National grew to $33.9 million, from $21.2 million. Losses widened at Colonial Penn, to a loss of $2.6 million from a $1.3 million loss a year earlier.

Revenue from other CNO business lines, including several being phased out, were down $53.6 million in the third quarter.

CNO posted an after-tax charge of $13.4 million relating to previously settled legal cases.

Earlier this year, CNO recorded a charge of $20 million from the tentative settlement of a legal dispute involving changes made late last year to certain life policies sold by CNO subsidiary Conseco Life Insurance Co.

Under the tentative settlement, the cost-of-insurance increase implemented by Conseco Life beginning in November will be reduced for certain policyholders. Holders whose policies terminated after November can reinstate their policies with the cost reduction or elect to take a cash-settlement option.

Also this year, the company said it agreed to pay $9.9 million to settle allegations by regulators in four states that its Bankers Life subsidiary acted as an investment adviser and broker-dealer without proper licensing. Those states are Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont and Missouri.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT