Colleges hike tuition as state reduces funding

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

There's a simple math lesson that supporters of Indiana's public universities want state lawmakers to learn: If they continue to reduce state funding for higher education, colleges will keep raising tuition and fees.

"It is the logical conclusion," said Senate Minority Leader Vi Simpson, a Democrat from the college town of Bloomington. "If people want to complain about the tuition increases, they should complain to the General Assembly."

But Republican fiscal leaders at the Statehouse are trying to teach college leaders another lesson — one that might have to be learned the hard way: If universities keep raising tuition past the recommended levels, state lawmakers can step in.

"I don't think the universities quite get it yet," said Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville. "We're trying to let them be in charge of their own destiny, but we need them to cooperate."

A quick look at the numbers shows why some lawmakers are so alarmed.

Students entering Indiana University at Bloomington will pay $9,500 a year in tuition and mandatory fees alone next year, a number that doesn't factor in thousands of dollars in room and board or any scholarships or financial aid. That's an increase of 5.5 percent from last year, and rates will go up more than 5 percent the following year, too.

If tuition and fees continued to grow at that pace, a child born this year would have to shell out about $25,000 in tuition 18 years from now — or $100,000 for a four-year degree. Out-of-state residents are seeing even higher increases over the next two years: A baby born in Michigan this year would face a shocking $380,000 bill to attend IU for four years if tuition keeps growing at current rates.

Some think that's out of control in a state where the median family income is about $45,000.

"People cannot afford these high-end approaches," Kenley said.

Kenley, the head budget writer in the Senate, has threatened action before. In 2009, he held university construction projects hostage because of unhappiness over tuition increases. He relented when colleges took action. IU created a program for students to receive discounts if they get good grades, and Purdue agreed to increase financial aid.

The chief budget writer in the House — Rep. Jeff Espich, R-Uniondale — has tried his own method to curb tuition hikes. He pushed for a budget this year that would prohibit colleges from exceeding the nonbinding tuition recommendations set by the state Commission for Higher Education. The provision was later changed, but lawmakers say they'll do what it takes if colleges don't heed these warnings.

Both Espich and Kenley, members of the state budget committee, said they want college leaders to explain why they raised tuition beyond the 3.5-percent increase that commission set as a recommended cap. Kenley said there's no reason for increases higher than that.

Universities say they'll be more than happy to explain. They're placing part of the blame on the General Assembly, and have numbers they say back up their arguments.

IU says it exceeded the commission's tuition recommendation of 3.5 percent for one simple reason: Lawmakers removed all repair and rehabilitation funding in the budget passed this year. The school's temporary fee of $180 per student for the upcoming school year — a fee that doubles to $360 in 2012 — put the school over the 3.5-percent limit.

"The only other source that we have for it is tuition," said IU spokesman Larry MacIntyre, adding that IU would drop the fee if lawmakers restore maintenance funding.

Purdue also exceeded the recommended limit by approving a 3.5-percent tuition hike and tacking on a $91 fee.

Ball State University says its proposed tuition increase of about 4 percent for undergraduates and 9 percent for graduate students is needed to offset cuts in state funding.

"It clearly is a driver," said Randy Howard, the school's vice president for business affairs and treasurer. "You hear a lot about the rising cost of tuition. You don't hear about the other leg of that revenue stream."

University leaders say they understand the dilemma faced by state lawmakers trying to balance Indiana's budget as the state tries to emerge from the recession. But they said they have few options left after leaving positions open, restructuring health care benefits and making other changes.

Historically, state spending on higher education has steadily grown, though higher education has been a shrinking part of the state's overall spending in recent years.

The cost of public education has always been shared between students and the state, but students are paying more as the state fails to keep up with the pace of per-pupil funding. In the 1970s, students paid about a third of the cost, the Commission for Higher Education estimates, while students shouldered about 50 percent of the burden in 2005.

The recession in the last few years forced state budget cuts for higher education. Indiana, Purdue and Ball State face state funding levels in 2012 that are about the same as they were a decade ago.

The schools say the financial setbacks are especially painful as they face rising costs and pressure to retain top faculty as they try to fulfill their missions of being among the country's top schools. Simpson said the demands put on the universities don't match up with state support, and something's got to give.

"We're asking them to be the locomotive that runs economic development in this state. We're asking them to have the very best faculty and attract the very best students," Simpson said. "And we're asking them to do it on less money."


  • Sheer Arrogance
    The sheer arrogance illustrated in the university mind set in these statements is beyond belief. I didn't see one comment from a university official about reducing costs - reducing overhead - changing the way they manage the university, etc. Stating that the fee increase problem is due to reduced tax payer funding is a non starter with me. I strongly suggest a new plan "B" for the Indiana university system be developed where they look internally for lower cost solutions and not blame others for their incompetence and lack of creativity. They are the ones supposedly gifted and educating Hoosiers on how to be more productive. The two biggest financial black holes in the US are government (any tax supported entity) and health care - they also happen to be the two areas the least accountable to their customers.
  • Don't Claim Poverty
    Oh I forgot to mention Universities also get investment income from their foundations, real estate holdings, patent portfolios ALL tax free, on top of many joint ventures like IU Health, Wishard, etc...

    A quick look at the salaries and benefits of these universities show current and retired personnel earning twice to three times the compensation of the Governor, Supreme Court Justice, Senate/House leadership, and the President of the United States.

  • Time To Teach Them A Lession
    Higher Education has many revenue streams that include local, state, & federal direct and indirect assistance. On top of that they get alumni, corporate, sports programs, and heavily subsidied domestic and international student tuition.

    They do all this with no cost restraints or accountability.

    Higher Education will be the next real estate bubble.

    It's time to propose radical higher education reform!!!

    Just look at the
  • Higher Education @ a too High price!
    As an older person,52 years of age to be exact,I decided to go back to college. After looking into the few college choices available in the Bllomington area I chose Ivy Tech Community College. It was not because I really wanted to. No, it was because the price to obtain a certificate for medical coding was so much cheaper. Harrison college wanted almost twice the amount as did Ivy Tech. But let me tell you, if I would have been close to a Harrison college I might have chosen them. Why because the run around that I got from the advisors and head of certain departments made me frustrated enough to want to quit! Now the colleges in the state are raising tuition? If they would fire some of the people who do not do their jobs correctly Ivy Tech would save millions of dollars! So I think that the staff of all colleges should have an evaluation just like that of employees of other companies do and if they do not meet certain citeria they should be fired just like other employees of other companies. Also the sports should not be as important as they are in college. Academics should be the focus of colleges not how well they do in a tournament! SO if they feel the need to raise our tuition they should put more focus on Academics! Unfortunately that will never happen because the money that they bring in from the sports venues are so great that it clouds the best of judgements.
  • Why Not Use The Surplus
    The Governor and General Assembly keep patting themselves on the back and claiming they created a budget with a surplus, slashed corporate taxes, etc. So, if we are to believe they have found a lot of extra money lying around, then why not simply increase the funding for higher education? Then, state universities will not have to raise their tuition and fees as much.

    In truth, the General Assembly and the Governor just want to push the hard decisions about services cuts and/or fee and tax increases onto the universities and also the local governments. However, when this makes the Governor and General Assembly look bad, then they want to interfere with the ability of universities and local government to make their own decisions about their own budgets.

    Once again, Indiana has a sham budget passed by the General Assembly and the Governor. The savings are achieved by simply passing hard decisions onto to someone else.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............