IBJNews

COLVIN: Get ready for a perfect storm in Worker's Compensation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

focus-voices-colvin-ryan.jpgWorker’s Compensation rates are on the rise and this time they will inspire a connection between safety and wellness programs.

Leading companies, through innovation or out of necessity, are integrating a culture of health into their organizations, not only to affect health insurance rates but also to mitigate their Worker’s Compensation costs.

It is the strategy organizations are deploying to control long-term costs and support a healthy work force. Managing these two programs as one strategic initiative is critical. And a significant side effect is healthier, higher-performing employees who pay lower medical costs, are more productive, have fewer absences due to health issues, and have fewer and less severe Worker’s Compensation claims.

Worker’s Compensation claims are all about human capital: employees. Unhealthy, unproductive, unengaged employees are among a company’s largest strategic risk. Numerous studies, rising health insurance rates, and employee turnover have pointed to this for years.

Now your Worker’s Compensation insurer is starting to pay attention. Those companies are coming to the realization that safety programs aren’t enough.

Yes, they are necessary and beneficial, but they don’t address the health and wellness of each employee. Insurers recognize the changing demographic of today’s employees: retiring at an older age and more likely to be overweight, which leads to co-morbid health issues like hypertension, diabetes and high cholesterol.

Let’s take a look at a real scenario that, at the outset, looks quite simple. Mary is in the supply room getting a box of paper. It falls on and injures her foot. Her employer sends an incident report to the company’s Worker’s Compensation carrier. A few days later, Mary’s foot is still bothering her with an ulcer forming at the impact site. Mary gets medical treatment, but the ulcer won’t heal.

Fast forward a few months to the possibility of Mary’s losing her foot—a complication of untreated diabetes.

Of course, this is an extreme example. But it takes only a few to create a trend and it’s a trend insurers are waking up to.

In and of themselves, rising rates will be noticeable. The property and casualty marketplace is cyclical, and rates generally fluctuate when there is a fundamental change in supply. Supply for the property and casualty industry is the surplus insurers amass and invest. Before the financial crisis of 2008, surplus was growing and investment yields provided a margin when risks were underwritten at a loss.

As the recession coincided with a soft rate market, insurers competed for market share and were quite willing to compete on price, an uncommon occurrence by most standards. Insurance buyers were ushered into an era of incredibly favorable premiums—with some receiving jaw-dropping low rates. Those jaw-dropping premiums are a thing of the past.

The most immediate causes for the increase are a rise in claim frequency, medical care inflation, and deteriorating underwriting results for Worker’s Compensation insurers. The financial crisis of 2008 caused insurers to write down their investment portfolios and reallocate seeking higher returns, but due to a prevalence of low-yielding investments, attractive returns were not possible.

Additionally, credit quality impaired insurers’ massive holding of corporate bonds. Add in the impact of Europe’s sovereign debt crisis and the drain on surplus caused by one of the worst catastrophic loss years on record in 2011, and insurers are seeking rate refuge.

With an aging and generally unhealthy population of Americans, combined with the hardening insurance market, a domino effect for Worker’s Compensation rates is inevitable. When you add it all up, you’ve got the makings of a perfect storm.•

__________

Colvin is managing principal in the Indianapolis Office of South Bend-based Gibson Insurance Agency Inc. Views expressed here are the writer’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Sickened
    "Mary" should be covered ONLY for the initial injury to her foot. Her untreated diabetic response is NOT a Workman's Comp issue. I can see where this is heading, and while the majority of people will be okay with this, when they pass this law it paves the way in the future for predisposition to an illness. Your workforce will steadily dwindle, and/or be forced to pay so much for insurance it will not be worth it. The way society is heading truly sickens me. Our humanity is being lost to greed.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT