IBJNews

COLVIN: Get ready for a perfect storm in Worker's Compensation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

focus-voices-colvin-ryan.jpgWorker’s Compensation rates are on the rise and this time they will inspire a connection between safety and wellness programs.

Leading companies, through innovation or out of necessity, are integrating a culture of health into their organizations, not only to affect health insurance rates but also to mitigate their Worker’s Compensation costs.

It is the strategy organizations are deploying to control long-term costs and support a healthy work force. Managing these two programs as one strategic initiative is critical. And a significant side effect is healthier, higher-performing employees who pay lower medical costs, are more productive, have fewer absences due to health issues, and have fewer and less severe Worker’s Compensation claims.

Worker’s Compensation claims are all about human capital: employees. Unhealthy, unproductive, unengaged employees are among a company’s largest strategic risk. Numerous studies, rising health insurance rates, and employee turnover have pointed to this for years.

Now your Worker’s Compensation insurer is starting to pay attention. Those companies are coming to the realization that safety programs aren’t enough.

Yes, they are necessary and beneficial, but they don’t address the health and wellness of each employee. Insurers recognize the changing demographic of today’s employees: retiring at an older age and more likely to be overweight, which leads to co-morbid health issues like hypertension, diabetes and high cholesterol.

Let’s take a look at a real scenario that, at the outset, looks quite simple. Mary is in the supply room getting a box of paper. It falls on and injures her foot. Her employer sends an incident report to the company’s Worker’s Compensation carrier. A few days later, Mary’s foot is still bothering her with an ulcer forming at the impact site. Mary gets medical treatment, but the ulcer won’t heal.

Fast forward a few months to the possibility of Mary’s losing her foot—a complication of untreated diabetes.

Of course, this is an extreme example. But it takes only a few to create a trend and it’s a trend insurers are waking up to.

In and of themselves, rising rates will be noticeable. The property and casualty marketplace is cyclical, and rates generally fluctuate when there is a fundamental change in supply. Supply for the property and casualty industry is the surplus insurers amass and invest. Before the financial crisis of 2008, surplus was growing and investment yields provided a margin when risks were underwritten at a loss.

As the recession coincided with a soft rate market, insurers competed for market share and were quite willing to compete on price, an uncommon occurrence by most standards. Insurance buyers were ushered into an era of incredibly favorable premiums—with some receiving jaw-dropping low rates. Those jaw-dropping premiums are a thing of the past.

The most immediate causes for the increase are a rise in claim frequency, medical care inflation, and deteriorating underwriting results for Worker’s Compensation insurers. The financial crisis of 2008 caused insurers to write down their investment portfolios and reallocate seeking higher returns, but due to a prevalence of low-yielding investments, attractive returns were not possible.

Additionally, credit quality impaired insurers’ massive holding of corporate bonds. Add in the impact of Europe’s sovereign debt crisis and the drain on surplus caused by one of the worst catastrophic loss years on record in 2011, and insurers are seeking rate refuge.

With an aging and generally unhealthy population of Americans, combined with the hardening insurance market, a domino effect for Worker’s Compensation rates is inevitable. When you add it all up, you’ve got the makings of a perfect storm.•

__________

Colvin is managing principal in the Indianapolis Office of South Bend-based Gibson Insurance Agency Inc. Views expressed here are the writer’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Sickened
    "Mary" should be covered ONLY for the initial injury to her foot. Her untreated diabetic response is NOT a Workman's Comp issue. I can see where this is heading, and while the majority of people will be okay with this, when they pass this law it paves the way in the future for predisposition to an illness. Your workforce will steadily dwindle, and/or be forced to pay so much for insurance it will not be worth it. The way society is heading truly sickens me. Our humanity is being lost to greed.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT