IBJNews

Committee considers but doesn’t vote on new VC tax credit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Senate committee debated a bill Monday that’s meant to help establish businesses in economically-depressed areas of Indiana, but members postponed a vote following questions about its usefulness.

Senate Bill 165, authored by Republican Sen. Randy Head of Logansport, would distribute up to $10 million in tax credits to venture capital firms investing in Indiana businesses.

The companies would be locked into a seven-year agreement with the state and would be required to pay a conditionally refundable fee of $500,000 and a non-refundable application fee of $5,000 for each project.

Head said the goal is to create jobs in the state’s economically depressed areas and draw venture capitalist groups to invest in Indiana businesses.

“There is no venture capital in Indiana and we are looking to change that,” Head said.

Republican Senator Brent Waltz of Indianapolis raised concerns about the bill’s necessity and the amount of help the tax credit would actually mean for local businesses.

“It’s remarkable, but I’m not sure it’s remarkable in a good way,” said Waltz, owner of a venture capitalist firm for 19 years.

Waltz also expressed his apprehension about the decision-making process to determine which businesses would be eligible to receive the tax credit.

“I’m nervous about creating a scenario where we are essentially creating winners and losers,” Waltz said.

The bill gives the Indiana Economic Development Corp. the authority to determine which projects qualify for the credits.

Mark Shublak, a lobbyist who has represented venture capital firms in the past, said the tax credits would go straight to the investors in those companies and not to the firms themselves. Shublak also said the businesses would essentially get the benefit of a low-percentage loan.

Committee members also discussed adding penalties to the bill for businesses that failed to provide jobs in the seven years they are given to earn back their deposit fee.

However, Shublak said he didn’t think investing companies should be penalized if jobs weren’t created in the seven-year time frame.

The Senate passed a version of the bill last year but it never made it out of a House committee.

Head said the committee would hold the bill for a week to make the necessary revisions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT