IBJNews

Community taps Walgreens for health reform help

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

In the era of health care reform, hospitals will face two new challenges: They will need to run higher-volume, lower-margin businesses, and they’ll be on the hook financially for what patients do even when they’re not receiving health care.

Community Health Network’s new partnership with Walgreens’ Take Care Clinics is designed to help address both issues.

The Indianapolis-based hospital system announced last week that it will form a clinical collaboration with Illinois-based Walgreens--directing patients, records and advice back and forth among Walgreens’ 14 Take Care clinics in the Indianapolis area and Community’s vast network.

Community has relationships with more than 2,000 central Indiana physicians who see patients at roughly 200 sites in the area. It even has five MedCheck clinics, which provide immediate care similar to the Take Care Clinics in Walgreens stores.

But it still made sense for Community to partner with Walgreens because many patients are far more likely to step foot in a drugstore than they are a doctor’s office—and some can be served more effectively in retail clinics, said Kyle Fisher, Community’s chief strategic development officer.

He cited one study that showed 60 percent of patients who visit a retail clinic do not have a primary care physician.

Also, a 2012 study by the Rand Corp. showed that visits to retail clinics quadrupled from 2007 to 2009, reaching nearly 6 million. In response, more hospitals around the country are forming partnerships with retail clinics.

“Health care delivery oftentimes is very fragmented. Patients choose to use different entry points to the health care system,” Fisher said. “This isn’t a decision to undo any of the fantastic work we’ve done through MedCheck and through our primary care practices or even through our employer clinics. This is really complementary as opposed to undoing a strategy that we’ve already had.”

Looked at another way, Community has some patients who come into its system via its emergency rooms at its hospitals, even though they could be served by a retail clinic. The cost of an ER visit easily can be 10 times higher than a retail clinic visit.

Under some provisions of the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, hospitals will be asked to manage the health of a specific population of patients, and to do it for less money than the previous year. So avoiding needless ER use will be in Community’s interest.

“We’re committed to take care of any patient, no matter how they enter the system,” Fisher said. “But as we look at health care reform and population-health management, that’s one of the tasks for us, as an integrated system--to better educate our patients on how to use the system.”

Fisher said Community’s physicians will be working with the nurse practitioners at Walgreens’ Take Care Clinics to develop protocols for how to handle patients in myriad situations.

“Our physicians want to be engaged in designing how that care takes place,” he said.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • effective date?
    any idea when the actual implementation date will be, all phases complete - I believe this is wonderful news and will be a wonderful asset to patients as well as both business.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT