IBJNews

Community taps Walgreens for health reform help

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In the era of health care reform, hospitals will face two new challenges: They will need to run higher-volume, lower-margin businesses, and they’ll be on the hook financially for what patients do even when they’re not receiving health care.

Community Health Network’s new partnership with Walgreens’ Take Care Clinics is designed to help address both issues.

The Indianapolis-based hospital system announced last week that it will form a clinical collaboration with Illinois-based Walgreens--directing patients, records and advice back and forth among Walgreens’ 14 Take Care clinics in the Indianapolis area and Community’s vast network.

Community has relationships with more than 2,000 central Indiana physicians who see patients at roughly 200 sites in the area. It even has five MedCheck clinics, which provide immediate care similar to the Take Care Clinics in Walgreens stores.

But it still made sense for Community to partner with Walgreens because many patients are far more likely to step foot in a drugstore than they are a doctor’s office—and some can be served more effectively in retail clinics, said Kyle Fisher, Community’s chief strategic development officer.

He cited one study that showed 60 percent of patients who visit a retail clinic do not have a primary care physician.

Also, a 2012 study by the Rand Corp. showed that visits to retail clinics quadrupled from 2007 to 2009, reaching nearly 6 million. In response, more hospitals around the country are forming partnerships with retail clinics.

“Health care delivery oftentimes is very fragmented. Patients choose to use different entry points to the health care system,” Fisher said. “This isn’t a decision to undo any of the fantastic work we’ve done through MedCheck and through our primary care practices or even through our employer clinics. This is really complementary as opposed to undoing a strategy that we’ve already had.”

Looked at another way, Community has some patients who come into its system via its emergency rooms at its hospitals, even though they could be served by a retail clinic. The cost of an ER visit easily can be 10 times higher than a retail clinic visit.

Under some provisions of the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, hospitals will be asked to manage the health of a specific population of patients, and to do it for less money than the previous year. So avoiding needless ER use will be in Community’s interest.

“We’re committed to take care of any patient, no matter how they enter the system,” Fisher said. “But as we look at health care reform and population-health management, that’s one of the tasks for us, as an integrated system--to better educate our patients on how to use the system.”

Fisher said Community’s physicians will be working with the nurse practitioners at Walgreens’ Take Care Clinics to develop protocols for how to handle patients in myriad situations.

“Our physicians want to be engaged in designing how that care takes place,” he said.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • effective date?
    any idea when the actual implementation date will be, all phases complete - I believe this is wonderful news and will be a wonderful asset to patients as well as both business.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT