IBJNews

Community to commercialize innovations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Community Health Network thinks it can help patients, engage doctors and maybe even make some money by trying to turn ideas within its organization into commercial products, service and companies.

It’s the latest in a string of efforts to capitalize on problem-solving that goes on inside local hospitals.

The Indianapolis-based hospital system last week announced a new Web portal called LaunchPad, which it aims to use to connect internal innovations with outside academic and corporate resources.

LaunchPad is being led by Pete Turner, Community’s vice president of innovation, and Kyle Fischer, chief strategic development officer, along with a six-member advisory board. The initiative is part of Community’s for-profit subsidiary, called Visionary Enterprises Inc.

VEI will be able to put money behind some of LaunchPad’s efforts, if that’s needed. But unlike the venture capital firm that rival Indiana University Health created five years ago, now called CHV Capital, Community is not creating a dedicated fund to back the initiative.

Instead, Community hopes to use LaunchPad as a place where physicians, nurses and other employees at Community’s seven hospitals and numerous outpatient locations can submit ideas to improve hospital processes or create solutions for internal challenges.

Then Community would like to form alliances with in-state universities, large corporations and individual entrepreneurs who could help the hospital system scale up those ideas and commercialize promising ventures for use by other health care groups.

“It could be a new process, it could be a new business, it could be a new technology that improves communication between our physicians and our patients. It could be an investment from VEI, where there could be a financial return,” Turner said.

Community hopes LaunchPad produces some innovations that improve patient care, giving it a competitive edge in the market.

But hospital leaders also see an effort to commercialize new ideas as a draw for physicians, for which it is in fierce competition with other hospitals, and a potential new stream of revenue if one of the ideas turns into a profitable company.

“Anything that we do we want to have a positive impact on patient care,” Fischer said. “We also think this is a great way to really engage our physicians in some really cool interactions. And if we’re really successful, we could have a health care startup come out of it.”

Hospitals have been a relatively untapped source of health care innovations in Indiana. But leaders at Indianapolis-based life sciences development group BioCrossroads have been quietly studying how Indiana might mimic the efforts of the Cleveland Clinic, which has spun out multiple companies from technologies and processes developed in its hospitals.

Also, an initiative of the Indianapolis-based technology group TechPoint has been working to match local information technology companies with hospital executives to try out their products.

For example, Indianapolis-based Diagnotes has been working with clinicians and IT heads at Franciscan St. Francis Health to improve a product that can send patient electronic medical records to the smartphone of any on-call doctor.

“It’s the right initiative at the right time,” Diagnotes CEO Dave Wortman said of TechPoint’s work.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT