Compromise bill allows state to spend $200M on interstates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence will have the opportunity to sign a bill that fulfills a key part of his legislative agenda after the House and Senate passed road funding legislation on Thursday.

The compromise bill allows Pence’s administration to spend $200 million on new highway projects starting July 1.

Then it puts the bipartisan State Budget Committee – which includes four lawmakers and the governor’s budget director – in charge of deciding when or even whether to transfer another $200 million from the state’s main checking account to the highway fund.

The bill’s author, Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso, said the money would be used for highway projects on the state’s priority list.

“There are projects all over the state,” Soliday said. “And these projects will stretch over far more than just two years by the time we’re doing them.”

Last year, lawmakers scheduled the $400 million to go into the Major Moves 2020 fund and the cash was intended for the widening of Interstates 69, 65 and 70 and the extension of I-69 in southern Indiana. Those were projects Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, had said the state needed to save up to afford.

But Pence had requested that the legislature allow him to spend all $400 million on projects now. The House said yes but the Senate balked, initially approving a version of House Bill 1002 that halved the amount.

In negotiations this week, the Senate relented – but only as long as the State Budget Committee retained some control over the cash. That means the members could opt not to transfer the money if the state’s tax receipts continue to fall below projections. The decision to approve or deny the transfer of the remaining $200 million is expected to be made after the release of the 2016-2017 state budget report.

The House passed the compromise bill 95-4, even as a number of lawmakers – including Democrats – complained that the legislation doesn’t include any money for local roads. As the legislation originally passed the House, it allocated $25 million to grants for local projects. But senators insisted that all the money be used for state highways.

“We call this Major Moves but it’s a major flop for our local governments,” said Rep. Greg Porter, D-Indianapolis. “They don’t get any money.”

Rep. Terri Austin, D-Anderson, said local governments are struggling under the weight of road problems and revenue reductions.

“Surely we can find it in our heart and our head and our pocketbook to find some money to help local government,” she said.

But Senate leaders just wouldn’t sign on to a deal that included money for local roads, Soliday said.

“I hear what you’re saying and I care about locals,” Soliday told his colleagues. “But we got the deal we could get.”

The compromised bill passed the Senate 43-5 after a debate that also included complaints about the lack of money for local roads.

“One thing I’ve learned here is that we don’t fix things that we break,” said Sen. Tim Skinner, D-Terre Haute. “I don’t know how long it’s going to take to make that final decision that we need to invest more in our local governments.”

House Bill 1004 now moves to the governor’s office for final consideration.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1