Conseco profit edges analyst expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Conseco Inc. beat analysts' estimates with a modest rise in first quarter profit, the company announced today.

The Carmel-based life and health insurer earned $33.9 million, more than 38 percent higher than during the same quarter a year ago. Nearly all of that increase, however, was due to lower losses on investments and debt modifications.

Excluding those things, Conseco would have earned $38.2 million this year, or 14 cents per share, up from $37.5 million, or 20 cents per share, a year earlier. In the past year, Conseco issued nearly 66 million additional shares as part of a recapitalization of the company.

Wall Street analysts were expecting 13 cents per share, excluding investment results, according to a survey by Thomson Financial.

Losses on investments and debt modifications narrowed in the quarter to $4.3 million, or 1 cent per share, from $13 million, or 7 cents per share, a year ago.

Profits increased at Conseco’s Bankers Life and Colonial Penn subsidiaries, but fell at its Conseco Insurance unit, which is based in Carmel.

However, sales of new policies were strongest at Conseco Insurance, rising 12 percent compared with the first quarter last year. Sales also rose at Chicago-based Bankers and Philadelphia-based Colonial.

Revenue for the quarter fell 6 percent to $1 billion. Analysts expected $1.04 billion.


  • Thanks
    for changing the original title.
  • misleading title
    Both, revenue and net income, are in line with expectations. The variance in sales is less than 1% unfavorable, while the variance in EPS is 1 cent favorable.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.