IBJNews

Conseco shares fall on weak profit forecast

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Conseco Inc. hopes that an amendment to its bank loans announced today helps it fetch a higher price in an upcoming public offering of stock.

But the company’s 2010 profit forecast, also announced today, is sending its shares in the opposite direction.

The Carmel-based life and health insurer expects profit next year in a range of $145 million to $170 million, or 55 cents to 65 cents per diluted share.

Those totals, which exclude investment gains or losses, are far lower than the 86 cents per share expected by Wall Street analysts, according to a survey by Thomson Financial Network.

The news sent shares of Conseco tumbling Tuesday morning as much as 7 percent to as low as $4.80 apiece.

Conseco plans to sell at least $200 million in new shares by mid-January.

Since Conseco’s investment assets plunged in value a year ago, investors have been concerned that the company is operating with slim margins on the terms of its bank loans.

To alleviate those concerns, the company is now negotiating for looser restrictions on its bank loans, which total $817.8 million.

For example, Conseco’s current loan agreement requires it to have at least $1.27 billion by June 30 in reserves at its insurance company units, something called statutory capital and surplus. But Conseco wants its lenders to step up those requirements gradually, from $1.1 billion now to $1.2 billion in 2011 and $1.3 billion in 2012.

Conseco is asking for similar breathing room on the amount of total capital it must have beyond the levels required by insurance regulators, as well as the amount of its earnings compared with the size of its interest payments.

In exchange, Conseco has agreed to pay $150 million of the proceeds of its stock offering toward its bank loans. If Conseco sells more than $200 million in stock, it will pay its lenders 50 cents of every dollar above $200 million.

Those payments would excuse Conseco from making its normally scheduled principal payments in 2010. But Conseco also would begin paying about $8 million a year in interest that it had been deferring until the end of the life of its loans.

In order to make these changes, Conseco would incur $2.3 million in fees.

It is the second time this year that Conseco has amended its bank loans. In March, when the company was facing a cash crisis, it agreed to make higher interest payments in exchange for looser requirements for its capital reserves.

The new agreement, if approved, would maintain those higher interest payments, which are costing the company $45 million a year.

But since March, Conseco has received a $78 million investment by a New York hedge fund, Paulson & Co., and has refinanced some of its bonds, making its capital position much more secure.

Tom Barta, Conseco’s senior vice president of financial planning and analysis, said Conseco does not mind paying down its debt and said the looser loan restrictions—also called covenants—should reassure investors.

“The market has always kind of undervalued our stock because of how tight everybody thought we were with our covenants,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT