Conseco trims CEO's pay but gives exec team raises

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel-based insurer Conseco Inc. CEO James Prieur’s pay fell 5 percent last year, taking his total compensation to $3.3 million, according to the company’s newly filed proxy statement.

But the rest of his management team enjoyed large pay hikes as Conseco reversed two years of losses with four straight profitable quarters.

Prieur, 58, who had led Conseco since 2006, earned $186,054 less than in 2008. Conseco’s revenue last year increased from $4.2 billion to $4.3 billion. Meanwhile, its bottom line swung from a $1.1 billion net loss to an $85.7 million profit.

Conseco’s share price increased 6 percent in 2009, to $5.

Prieur’s salary was $900,000. But most of his pay last year came in the form of restricted stock and option grants worth $1.3 million and a performance-based bonus of $1.1 million.

In 2008, Conseco had awarded Prieur a performance-based bonus worth $633,800, which he chose not to accept due to the recession and the company’s financial condition. When that bonus is included, Prieur’s 2009 pay cut was 20 percent.

Pay for other top executives:

—Chief Financial Officer Edward Bonach earned $1.5 million, up 26 percent.

—40/86 Advisors Inc. President Eric Johnson earned $1.4 million, up 41 percent.

—Bankers Life and Casualty Co. President Scott Perry earned $1.5 million, up 54 percent.

—Conseco Insurance Group President Steven Stecher earned $1.2 million, up 25 percent.

IBJ uses the Associated Press formula to calculate executive pay. It gauges the value of compensation such as stock and options grants at the time they are awarded, not the time they are cashed in.

Conseco spent $1 million last year on combined board compensation for its eight independent directors, 33.2 percent less than it spent in 2008.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!