IBJNews

Cook again tops list of richest Hoosiers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The widow of medical device industry pioneer Bill Cook again is the top Hoosier on the latest Forbes 400 list of the nation’s wealthiest people.

Gayle Cook of Bloomington ranks 104th with a net worth of $3.7 billion, according to the annual list released Wednesday. Though her net worth increased from $3.4 billion last year, Cook slipped out of the top 100, from her previous ranking of 96th. Bill Cook, who died in April 2011, founded Cook Group Inc. in Bloomington.

Simon Property Group co-founder and Indiana Pacers owner Herb Simon continues to rise in the rankings, from No. 330 in 2010, to No. 273 in 2011 and to No. 218 this year. His wealth increased from $1.25 billion to $2.2 billion during that span.

Hotelier Dean White of Crown Point was the next wealthiest Hoosier, ranked No. 271 with $1.8 billion.

Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay climbed one spot in the rankings, to No. 311, with a net worth of $1.5 billion.

Microsoft Corp.’s co-founder Bill Gates remains the nation’s richest man by far, taking the top spot for the 19th consecutive year with a net worth of $66 billion.

Investor Warren Buffett, the head of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., again took second with $46 billion.

Forbes said the rich mostly got richer in 2012, with net worth rising for 241 members of its list and shrinking for only 66. Rising stock prices, a rebound in real estate values and an increase in rare art prices helped.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wow
    That 2% sales tax on medical devices really will be crippling.
  • Correction
    @JJ I think you meant 'socialize risk and privatize profits'. Couldn't agree more with your sentiment.
  • Why are you suprised?
    The redistrubution from the masses to the few rich continures, Simon, alone, has received over 440 million, according to your own paper in direct subsidies from the city and state. The city is a 25% payer for the JW, and everyone knows the numbers for Irsay. As always, socialize risk, and privatize risk. The lower 99% continues to pay for the 1%.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

    2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

    3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

    4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

    5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

    ADVERTISEMENT