Cook calls for new approach to health reform

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The current health care reform proposals will not work, says Bill Cook, the founder of Bloomington-based medical device maker Cook Group Inc.

But Indiana’s richest man has a plan that will, according to a blog post Monday night. He called for a network of federally-funded clinics, a new federal insurance program for hospital procedures, medical malpractice reform with Indiana-style caps on damage awards, and the freedom to buy health insurance across state lines.

“As a nation, we have unwittingly increased medical costs by not understanding how to lower costs: treat diseases early through the simple methodology of performing diagnosis, minor surgery, and drug regimens in a small, clinic environment,” wrote Cook, 77.

Rather than pay to expand health insurance, Cook wrote, Congress should fund a nationwide network of free and low-cost clinics “spread throughout cities, towns and countrysides.”

When patients need more complex care, the clinics could refer them to the community hospitals or major medical centers that already exist. Procedures at those facilities would be paid by a new federal insurance program.

Cook said Congress should create and staff enough clinics to treat 12 million to 20 million people who are currently uninsured. Existing bills in Congress would cover roughly 30 million of the uninsured, which total about 46 million over the course of each year, according to some estimates.

Cook did not venture a cost estimate for his plan.

His inspiration comes from a clinic Cook Group operates in Bloomington for its employees and their families. That clinic serves about 5,000 people. A recent study by a committee at Indiana University cited the Cook clinic as something the university could try to reduce its own health insurance costs.

Also, as a young medical service corpsman in the Army, Cook saw the uninsured residents of San Antonio, Texas, come to the Army hospital for care because “there was nowhere else they could turn.”

Cook founded his medical device firm in 1963. It now is a global operation that employs 9,500 people and has annual revenue of $1.5 billion.

Forbes magazine estimates that Cook’s wealth totals $5 billion.


  • works in Boston
    This concept seems to work very well. In Boston a large medical group has a total care solution that covers the health of the individual and whatever it takes to achieve it--including prevention. It incentivises the doctors to make treatment decisions based on the long-term cost of the client so essentially, they automatically look for the best treatment at the best cost.

    The trick is to legislate that the treatment "hives" be large enough to provide all types of treatment, yet small enough to be negatively impacted by poor decisions.

    Let the most efficient solution win!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.