Cornelius to retire as Bristol-Myers Squibb CEO

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Former Guidant Corp. CEO James M. Cornelius has announced his retirement as chief executive of drugmaker Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., the company announced Tuesday.

The Trenton, N.J.-based company's board chose Lamberto Andreotti, 59, to replace Cornelius as CEO effective May 4. Cornelius, 66, will remain as Bristol's chairman. Andreotti has been Bristol's president and chief operating officer since March 2009.

Cornelius became Bristol's chairman in February 2008 after being elected CEO by the board of directors in April 2007. That was after he had served as interim CEO for about eight months.

"I said before I was a reluctant CEO," this time, Cornelius said Tuesday during a conference call. "I truly didn't have any aspirations to become a CEO" again and had to "convince my wife to move from Indianapolis to New York."

Yet, just five weeks ago, during a conference call announcing fourth quarter results, Cornelius told analysts asking about succession planning that he didn't intend to retire soon because he was still enjoying the job. He said he and his family are still discussing what's next, but that they will be moving back to Indianapolis.

Cornelius previously served as chief financial officer at Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co., where he worked for nearly three decades before first "retiring" in 1995. He then retired twice from medical device maker Guidant Corp., in 2000 and again in 2006.

Cornelius served as chairman emeritus of the Guidant board of directors when it closed its merger into Boston Scientific in April 2006. Previously, he had been chairman and CEO during the merger process and was responsible for the company's initial public offering and subsequent split-off from Eli Lilly in 1995.

Prior to his role at Guidant, Cornelius was Lilly's CFO from 1983 to 1995. From 1980 to 1982, he was CEO of former Lilly subsidiary IVAC Corp.

During his time at the helm of Bristol-Myers, Cornelius initiated a strategy dubbed the "String of Pearls" to sell off noncore businesses such as its Mead Johnson nutrition franchise and buy multiple pearls , biotech companies or products in development , to transform the company into a biopharmaceutical powerhouse.

Andreotti said the company already has completed nine such deals.

The most prominent was last summer's $2.1 billion purchase of biotech company Medarex Inc. It owns successful antibody technology used to create biologic drugs that make the immune system attack cancer cells , and it has several of its own drugs in development.

Most of Bristol's competitors instead have been focused on diversifying their product lines and slashing costs.

Bristol-Myers is the maker of blood thinner Plavix, the world's second-best-selling drug.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.