IBJNews

Corporations still deal-shy even as stocks surge

Associated Press
November 20, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A surging stock market usually comes with a boom in corporate deal-making.

But deals are lagging this year, even as the market notches a series of record highs and is headed for its best year in a decade.

Deal levels are sluggish for a number of reasons. The U.S. economic recovery has been slow and unsteady. Investors are concerned that growth could falter if the Federal Reserve withdraws its huge stimulus program too quickly. Stock valuations are getting pricier. There are also fears of more budget fights in Washington, D.C., and a possible default by the U.S. government.

"If you're an investor, a C-Suite executive trying to make a big bet, you're probably going to be more cautious," said Richard Jeanneret, who advises companies on mergers and divestitures as a member of the Americas executive board at EY, the global consultancy firm formerly known as Ernst & Young.

The value of U.S. deals announced through the first nine months of 2013 was 33 percent below the same period in 2007, when the stock market was also marching toward an all-time high and deals surged. Mergers and acquisition totaled $761 billion through September, compared with $1.1 trillion over the same stretch in 2007.

Executives are also holding back because they see stocks becoming more expensive relative to earnings. Companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index have an average price-earnings ratio — a measure of how much investors are willing to pay for future earnings — of 15.1. That's up from 12.6 at the start of this year.

Mergers fell off dramatically after 2007 as companies retrenched and focused on survival in the wake of the financial crisis and Great Recession.

An economic recovery that began more than four years ago has been halting, but the broader stock market has surged. The Standard & Poor's 500 index has climbed 160 percent since its recession low in March 2009.

A pair of big-name deals in February led investors to think the M&A market was heating up. Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway joined another investment firm to acquire Heinz for $23.3 billion and Michael Dell offered to take his computer company private for $24 billion. But instead of inspiring more corporate combinations, big deals fizzled out after those two were announced.

Other events have given deal-makers pause. In October, investors saw how dysfunctional Washington had become. An impasse over the federal budget led to a 16-day partial shutdown of the government. The U.S. also came close to defaulting on its debt.

The most recent peak in U.S. deal activity came in the second quarter of 2007, when U.S. companies announced $508 billion of acquisitions, according to EY data. Less than four months later, in October, the S&P 500 reached 1,565, a record at the time.

A surge in acquisitions also preceded a run-up in the stock market in the late 1990s. Companies announced $1.5 trillion worth of deals in 1999 before deals dropped off when the technology-bubble burst. The S&P 500 climbed to a record in March 2000.

Analysts have been expecting a pickup in deals for some time partly because companies are sitting on record piles of cash. Borrowing costs are also low, another factor that encourages deal-making.

Stock prices typically rise when there is a lot of merger activity because the acquiring companies typically pay more than the target companies' market price. A more ebullient M&A market can also lead to bidding wars between acquiring companies, pushing stock prices even higher.

Now, when an acquiring company sweetens its offer to buy a company, it's often paying less of a premium.

The average premium paid in deals this year is 20 percent, the lowest since 1995, according to data from Dealogic. The average premium paid by acquirers since then is 32 percent.

In the past, advances in the stock market coincided with a rising tide of deals.

An increase in deal-making would be a positive sign for the stock market because it indicates that companies are more confident about future growth, said Alec Young, a global equities strategist at S&P Capital IQ. However, if the pace of mergers were to pick up to a "frenzy," as in 2007, that may signal that the broader stock market has peaked, Young said.

Mergers are unlikely to pick up significantly before economic growth climbs above 3 percent, said Mark Haefele, chief investment officer at UBS Wealth Management. That's a level where executives start to feel more comfortable that their investment in another company will pay off.

By that measure, a pickup in deals may materialize soon.

U.S. economic growth accelerated to a 2.8 percent annual rate in the third quarter, the Commerce Department reported in its initial estimate of growth for the period. That was up from 2.5 percent in the previous quarter and nearly a full percentage point higher than economists had predicted.

If executives see competitors going on a buying spree, their attitudes toward M&A may change quickly and the pace of deal-making could pick up, says EY's Jeanneret.

"It's kind of 'You go first' mentality," Jeanneret says.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT