IBJNews

Court issues restraining order against Lilly

 IBJ Staff and Associated Press
May 26, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc. said Thursday that a federal court has issued an injunction preventing drug development partner Eli Lilly and Co. from using the same sales force to sell an Amylin-developed diabetes treatment and a competitor's.

Amylin says the temporary restraining order prevents Lilly from continuing with a plan to sell both Byetta and Boehringer Ingelheim's linagliptin. Amylin and Indianapolis-based Lilly entered an agreement in 2002 to develop and sell Byetta, a type 2 diabetes treatment.

San Diego-based Amylin filed a lawsuit against Lilly earlier this month, accusing the drugmaker of breaking their commercialization deal for diabetes drugs by teaming with Boehringer Ingelheim to develop and sell a competing product.

Lilly entered a development agreement with Germany's Boehringer Ingelheim in January. Earlier this month, regulators approved linagliptin, which also treats type 2 diabetes. Amylin then filed the lawsuit against Lilly over that arrangement.

Lilly says it is disappointed in the court's decision but will take the necessary steps to comply with the order.

"We believe that Amylin's allegations against Lilly are entirely without merit and we fully expect to prevail in this litigation," Lilly senior vice president and general counsel Robert A. Armitage said in a statement.

Company spokesman Mark Taylor declined to comment beyond the statement, which was issued late Wednesday night.

The injunction also prevents Lilly from disclosing any confidential information about Byetta, known generically as exenatide, to sales representatives selling linagliptin, which goes by the brand name Tradjenta.

Type 2 is the most common form of diabetes. People with the disease have trouble breaking down carbohydrates because their bodies have become resistant to the protein insulin. They are at higher risk for heart attacks, kidney problems, blindness and other serious complications.

Lilly said in January it would pay Boehringer about $387 million as part of a joint bid to develop and sell up to five drugs. The companies will split revenue from any approved drugs, not counting costs for making and selling the product. Each drugmaker also will receive payments based on whether their products reach certain milestones, like submissions for approval.

Amylin and Lilly also are seeking regulatory approval for a longer-lasting version of Byetta called Bydureon. Amylin has said it plans to continue working with Lilly, but that company's deal with Boehringer amounts to anticompetitive behavior.

Lilly has said patients and doctors need choices to fight diabetes, and its strategy for the chronic disease involves offering a broad range of options. It also said injectables like Byetta generally compete with other injectables, not tablets like Tradjenta.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. To get a pay raise, the teacher must score a "4" on a rubric that only has a "4' as the highest score. therefore all the administrator has to do is mark you a '3" in one area and no pay raise. My wife's evaluation "interestingly" now is lower than the last three years and no pay raise. My brother teaches around Indy where all of a sudden the highest score is 3.25 ie frozen pay raises.This is a faulty scoring system when a teacher would have to score perfect in all categories.Meanwhile, the administrators all got pay raises and two more were hired.It will be interesting to see what the administrators spouses score.
    The state needs a scoring system the rewards an effective teacher not a perfect teacher. I taught bfor 40 years and never used a scoring system that required perfection to reward my top students

  2. 'Floundering' would seem to indicate the sport is not long for the world. Sixteen years seems like a long time to 'flounder.'

    When one looks objectively at the metrics that matter; e.g., sponsorship, attendance an ratings, all are up.

    Is this another of those silly hater deals where you hold the sport of today up against the sport of twenty years ago then try some cutesy, childlike comparison to validate your little straw man?

    Here's another question: What is the specific purpose of television ratings?

  3. It will be really nice having another parking garage across the street from the two already on Illinois's east side. And there is another huge one just north of Michigan. If we fill in the surface lot north of Vermont and tear down that ridiculously old fashioned Rink Building we can achieve something few other municipalities can boast of: a 3 full city block canyon of parking garages.

    Plus, if there is a building downtown that merits imitation it is the One America tower. I propose it be the standard for all future design. And I propose we change our city name to Dystopolis.

  4. What is it on it's way back from? Pick one, let's discuss:

    - All oval series = FAILURE
    - Control AOW, Kill Sport = SUCCESS
    - Quality Field versus Quantity Field = FAILURE
    - Driver Death/Poor Chassis Design = FAILURE
    - More American/Less Foreign Drivers = FAILURE
    - More Street Courses/Less Ovals = SUCCESS
    - Merger/Asset Aquire with CCWS = SUCCESS
    - Penske wins all the time = SUCCESS
    - LOTUS barely is 3rd Manufacturer = FAILURE
    - Less Major Network TV/More Obscure TV = SUCCESS
    - Traditions Sacrificed for Survival = SUCCESS

    These are just a few topics....how is Indy on it's way back up?

  5. Chicken in a Biscuit

ADVERTISEMENT