IBJNews

Crime-grant selection enters final round

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A smaller budget and new selection process for Indianapolis’ crime-prevention grant program has thrown some local not-for-profits for a loop.

Several organizations that received funding in the past were eliminated in the first round of evaluations this year, and that won’t be the end of the disappointments. The selection panel will chose grantees from 27 finalists on Friday, and the awards will be announced June 1.

The selection process changed this year when the City-County Council put administration of the program in the hands of the Indianapolis Parks Foundation, an effort to make the program less political and possibly draw private sources of funding. The crime-prevention grants are funded at the council's discretion through income-tax revenue.

Previously, an advisory board made recommendations, and the council then changed or approved them. Under the new process, the parks foundation nominated an independent seven-member selection panel. One of the members is a mayor's appointee, and another is the clerk of the council.

This year, the parks foundation fielded 115 applications seeking $12 million, executive director Cindy Porteous said. But because of the city's ongoing budget crunch, the council cut the grant funds by more than half. Last year 68 organizations divvied up about $4 million. With only $1.7 million for grants this time, 88 organizations were eliminated from contention in the first round.

Porteous said she’s met or spoken with executives from several of those groups. “There were disappointments,” she said.

Travis DiNicola, executive director of the literacy group IndyReads, said he thought his organization would get further consideration because research shows a link between literacy rates and crime. IndyReads last year received $24,000 to help place volunteer tutors in city jails, but this year was eliminated after submitting a brief description of its program, as requested.

DiNicola said he thought the chance to make a strong case would come later. “I think the process was one that was confusing,” he said.

Adding to the crunch: The parks foundation is trying to make a more noticeable impact with a smaller budget, so it is raising the minimum grant amount to $50,000.

Porteous said a number of applicants weren’t sure how they would pay for their programs, other than with the city’s grant. Next year, she’d like to offer any not-for-profit that’s interested training on where else to look for crime-prevention grants and how to land them. “We think we have the capacity to do that as well.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

ADVERTISEMENT