IBJNews

Cummins' stock rises despite lower revenue, profit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Cummins Inc.'s stock jumped more than 6 percent in morning trading after its quarterly results beat analyst estimates.

Shares rose even though Cummins today reported dramatically lower revenue and profit in the second quarter compared to the same period a year ago. Shares climbed $2.54 late this morning, to $42.27 each.

Quarterly revenue at the Columbus-based engine maker fell 37 percent, from $3.9 billion a year ago to $2.4 billion this year.

Profit was $56 million, or 28 cents a share, down from $293 million, or $1.49 a share, a year ago.

Cummins said second-quarter earnings included a $7 million charge for cost-reduction actions. Excluding the charge, Cummins had a profit of $60 million, or 30 cents per share, exceeding the estimates of 25 cents per share by 13 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News.

The company's second-quarter sales almost matched the first quarter's, but profit was eight times greater. Cummins attributed the increase to "ongoing efforts to reduce costs and align manufacturing capacity to the lower demand."

Cummins cut about 7,800 jobs from October 2008 through May, according to Bloomberg. The company had 39,800 workers at the beginning of the year.

The company experienced lower demand in every business segment in the second quarter compared to a year ago. Sales in the engine segment fell 45 percent, to $1.31 billion. They were down 36 percent in the power generation segment, to $610 million; 41 percent lower in components, to $502 million; down 20 percent in distribution, to $463 million; and 17 percent lower in joint ventures, to $57 million.

"The economic climate continues to be extremely challenging, and we are managing our business under the assumption that we won't see any recovery in our markets in 2009," said Cummins Chairman and CEO Tim Solso in a prepared statement. "Still, our aggressive efforts to reduce costs and align manufacturing capacity with demand have allowed us to perform well under the circumstances and to position ourselves to emerge from the downturn an even stronger company."

Cummins said it still expects overall sales for 2009 to be about 30-percent lower than 2008 and anticipates earnings before interest and taxes of 5 percent of sales, excluding restructuring charges.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT