IBJNews

Dan Laikin spurred probe of Tim Durham, filings reveal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Greg Andrews

Indicted Indianapolis financier Timothy Durham didn’t appear to know he was in big trouble until Nov. 24, 2009, the day the FBI conducted high-profile raids of his office atop Chase Tower downtown and Fair Finance Co.’s Akron, Ohio, headquarters.

But court documents filed in Durham’s criminal case reveal the FBI had been investigating Durham since March 2009, when his friend Dan Laikin, a Fair Finance board member, offered up incriminating information on Durham in hopes of securing a lighter sentence for himself in an unrelated case.

That’s according to affidavits that FBI Special Agent Dennis Halliden signed in November 2009 in support of the government’s requests to set up wiretaps and conduct the raids.
 

Durham Durham

That March 2009 meeting marked the opening of the criminal inquiry, according to a summary of one of the affidavits included in an order issued last month by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. The affidavits themselves are under seal, but portions have been excerpted in recent months by attorneys and Magnus-Stinson, who is overseeing the fraud case against Durham and two business associates that’s scheduled for trial next month.

According to the affidavits, Laikin told the FBI in the March 2009 meeting that “Timothy Durham has been running a Ponzi scheme via Fair Finance” and that “Fair Finance funds have paid for Durham’s extravagant lifestyle and luxury cars.”

Two years later, prosecutors lowered the boom, charging Durham masterminded a scheme to raid Fair coffers to fund millions of dollars in personal expenses and to prop up other failing businesses he controlled.

Authorities charged that, after buying Fair in 2002, Durham pulled out money with such abandon that he left it without the means to repay Ohio investors who purchased the company’s high-yield investment certificates. More than 5,200 investors are owed $230 million.

Recent court filings clarify that Laikin—an Indianapolis businessman who served as CEO of Los Angeles-based National Lampoon Inc.—actually had not used the term “Ponzi scheme” when he met with the FBI in March 2009. But his attorney had when he proposed the meeting. The affidavit says that, during the meeting, Laikin refused to cooperate further unless the government agreed to a reduced sentence, which it declined to provide.

Eighteen months later, a federal judge in Philadelphia sentenced Laikin to nearly four years in prison for orchestrating an ultimately unsuccessful scheme to pump up the slumbering stock price of National Lampoon.

The wiretap affidavit says that between the March 2009 meeting with Laikin and the raids, the FBI interviewed Laikin’s brother, Brightpoint Inc. CEO Bob Laikin, who said “he fully [expected] to pick up the newspaper one morning and see … Durham … indicted for running a Ponzi scheme.” Bob Laikin was not involved in either Fair or National Lampoon.

During the same span, the FBI lined up two confidential informants who were able to provide reliable information but had never personally discussed criminal activity with Durham, court records say.

The Securities and Exchange Commission was conducting its own civil investigation during this period, court records say, relying in part on a cooperating Fair Finance investor who had been unable to get his money out when the investment came due.

Coincidentally, IBJ in the spring of 2009 also had begun scrutinizing Durham’s dealings with Fair. An article the newspaper published one month before the raids questioned whether the heavy withdrawals—which Durham characterized as insider loans—left Fair insolvent.

Dan Laikin himself was a big recipient of Fair Finance loans, according to a lawsuit the company’s bankruptcy trustee filed against him two years ago.

Durham and Laikin go back a long way. Both were part of an Indianapolis contingent that scarfed up National Lampoon shares more than a decade ago. And after Laikin’s arrest, Durham succeeded him as CEO.

It’s not clear how friendly they are now.

In an August 2011 deposition, Laikin said Durham had visited him earlier that year at the U.S. Penitentiary in Lompoc, Calif., where he is serving his sentence. Among other things, the two talked about continuing efforts to bolster National Lampoon.

But Laikin didn’t sound so keen on Durham in his deposition. He said Durham had appointed him to the board without asking him. Laikin said he’d never been asked to attend a board meeting and knew little about the company’s inner workings.

He’s contending that Fair financial statements showing he owes the company more than $20 million are wrong. And in his deposition, he put little faith in any of Fair’s recordkeeping under Durham.

Asked whether he had any reason to question Fair records listing him as joining the board in June 2006, Laikin said: “I have multimillions of reasons … because I don’t have any confidence in a majority of documents I am seeing that originated with Tim.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Credit due
    And for Hawkey Greg Andrews as well as Hot Lips never quitter, let's give credit where it is due.
  • Thank G-d 4 the Philly SEC
    Had it not been for the diligence of the Philadelphia SEC office's regional director (Daniel Hawke), this Ponzi scam would still be going on.

    Great story.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

    2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

    3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

    4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

    5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

    ADVERTISEMENT