Daniels criticized for lopping costs on I-69 extension

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Standing along a two-mile ribbon of fresh concrete, with 140 miles more of Interstate 69 to build, Gov. Mitch Daniels nevertheless appeared triumphant in May.

The first stretch of the new road—from Evansville to Crane—would be finished by the end of 2012, three years ahead of schedule and on budget at $700 million, Daniels proclaimed just north of Evansville.

“The completion of the I-69 dream is nearer than anyone imagined,” Daniels told downstaters who’ve long complained of being neglected by Indianapolis. The highway will mean “more jobs in Indiana, corner to corner.”

The controversial highway won’t be exactly as everyone dreamed, however, raising questions whether Daniels is undermining the road’s economic development potential.

At least two interchanges of the southernmost section are being deferred. A handful of overpasses along with a rest stop also have vanished from original plans. And the state has invited contractors to bid asphalt alongside the concrete that’s traditionally considered superior for new-terrain interstates.

As a result, critics are complaining the Evansville-to-Indianapolis project, whose cost estimate has swelled from $1.8 billion to $3 billion, won’t live up to its promised economic development potential.

They also contend compromises could haunt future generations with greater maintenance costs. Concrete can last 50 years versus the 15 to 20 years before asphalt needs a major topping.

“If you start cutting all that stuff, you’re not going to get the [supposed] benefits,” said Thomas Tokarski, who heads Citizens for Appropriate Rural Roads, a Bloomington area not-for-profit that opposes the I-69 extension. “It’s bait-and-switch.”

Tim Maloney, senior policy director of the Indianapolis-based Hoosier Environmental Council, said, “If you’re deleting interchanges, you’re deleting one of the rationales for the highway.”

Maloney’s group still argues the project should be canceled in favor of upgrades to Interstate 70 west of Indianapolis to Terre Haute and then south on U.S. 41 to Evansville.

The Indiana Department of Transportation downplays the effect of the proposed changes.

It is only deferring construction of two interchanges, one in south Daviess County at State Road 57 and another in northern Pike County, the department says, and the savings could hit $34 million.

“As we reviewed the data, the numbers did not support the need for those interchanges at this time,” said INDOT spokeswoman Cher Goodwin.

However, INDOT will buy land now for the northern Pike interchange in anticipation of its being needed in the future.

Traffic counts suggest the interchange would be used infrequently at first, but Petersburg Mayor John W. Craig said the interchange nevertheless could shift more than 1,000 coal trucks a day off its main street and position the town for growth.

“This area is poised for further industrial growth with the construction of the interchange,” added Craig, who sees it as access not just to Indianapolis but to the rest of the world. “All of our eggs have been in one big basket, a big basket of coal.”

Also disappointed are folks in Daviess County, although the area of the now-deferred interchange doesn’t have sewers large enough for significant economic development.

“Because of the limited economic development potential, I don’t see it as a detriment” now, said Ron Arnold, executive director of the Daviess County Economic Development Corp.

I-69Besides deferring two interchanges, INDOT has been able to get lower-than-expected bids for materials and construction work. Materials such as cement are in less demand with the cooling of the residential and commercial construction markets. Hungry contractors aren’t as busy and are willing to make less money to stay busy.

“We’re finding overall our bids are coming in up to 30 percent less than our engineers estimate,” Goodwin said.

Highway opponents also have noted that the width of center medians appears to have been narrowed, from 84 feet to 60 feet, to save money. Tokarski said that could mean safety hazards, particularly from large trucks that could cross the median into oncoming lanes.

INDOT’s Goodwin counters that 60-foot medians are typical for rural interstates. The 84-foot medians are generally reserved for areas where highway planners anticipate adding lanes in the future, she said. “There is no need for any potential third lane to be constructed.”

Flirting with asphalt

Perhaps the most controversial aspect of INDOT’s quest to stay on budget, one that could become more of an issue as it builds potentially more expensive northern segments, involves its choice in pavement types.

Agency documents reveal that INDOT last year quietly sought alternate bids to determine whether to use asphalt or concrete on 10 projects—mostly on U.S. 31 upstate but also for a stretch of I-69 to be built in Gibson County.

Ordinarily, INDOT determines the pavement type before letting bids. But the department invited contractors to submit bids in either type for the 10 projects.

The idea, said INDOT spokesman Will Wingfield, was to invite competition between contractors from both asphalt and concrete industries in the hope of lowering costs for INDOT and ultimately benefiting taxpayers.

INDOT estimates the new process saved taxpayers $325,000. The department chose concrete after sifting through 11 bids rather than the typical five. Six contractors proposed concrete and five, asphalt. Concrete was deemed to offer the lowest long-term cost despite the asphalt being cheapest initially.

INDOT also invited alternate bids on a stretch of I-69 in Daviess County. It received at least one bid for asphalt, from Indianapolis-based Milestone Contractors LP.

Milestone ultimately lost to a bidder that proposed concrete. Asphalt, which is generally less expensive than concrete construction, has been less competitive in recent years as the price of its key ingredient, oil binder, shot to $485 per ton from $390 a ton in June last year, according to INDOT price data.

Road repairs funded by federal stimulus programs also have pushed up the price of asphalt.

“We haven’t been successful, so far,” Milestone’s president, Ted Lucas, said of I-69. “We just couldn’t overcome the big material price differential.”

Asphalt comeback?

That’s not to say asphalt won’t become an attractive alternative for I-69 in years ahead, particularly when the economy improves and the price of concrete rises with renewed demand.

In fact, the Asphalt Association of Indiana has been lobbying INDOT to be more open to asphalt. Last fall, the group presented a paper to top agency officials calling for reducing I-69 construction costs “without compromising the integrity of the design.”

Among concepts it floated to INDOT was “staged asphalt” construction, in which a thinner layer could be applied initially—say 9 inches rather than the foot or more normally used on major new highways. Then, as traffic increases in 10 or 15 years, an inch or two of the top layer would be stripped off to remove the rutted surface and a 7-inch strengthening layer could be added.

Such a technique could save $700,000 per lane mile in construction costs, the association told INDOT. Milestone proposed the technique when it bid on paving a portion of I-69. Lucas noted that portions of Interstate 64 in southern Indiana were built using such a method decades ago.

The association has also proposed other techniques, such as thinning pavement in passing lanes and inside shoulders, noting that big trucks spend most of their time in the slow lane.

Uncertain future

The state might need to reconsider some of the asphalt industry’s other ideas as it proceeds farther north with I-69 construction.

INDOT estimates it can complete the first three of six sections with the $700 million it allocated toward I-69 from the $3.8 billion lease of the Indiana Toll Road in 2006.

And although Daniels insists that a fourth section, between Crane and Bloomington, can be finished in 2014, that section is largely unfunded. Typically, the federal government covers at least 80 percent of the cost of such projects, but Congress has yet to take up a multiyear surface transportation funding.

“That will be a major determining factor moving forward,” Wingfield said.

Besides funding issues, Maloney of the Hoosier Environmental Council notes INDOT faces more difficult terrain as it moves north from flat farm fields toward Bloomington, which is rocky and underlain with karst, limestone riddled with sinkholes, fissures and caves.

There will be additional environmental issues, as well. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency told INDOT in March that “streams and karst features are resources of concern” in the southernmost section of I-69, and urged it to keep detailed records of potential effects.

Farther north, INDOT’s challenges will include routing the highway through the Martinsville area and through suburbanized Perry Township, completing the section with a tie-in to Interstate 465 on the south side of Indianapolis.•


  • Scenic Indiana
    Great can't wait for more billboards in Indiana's most scenic corner.
  • Criticized for cutting costs?
    Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
  • Actual Bids
    Too bad the article did not make any references to actual bid opening on the project coming in LESS than the engineer estimates with savings over $30 million so far. Just a little research is all.
  • ibDj
    I keep forgetting that there is a silent D in IBJ. The D is for Democrat. If O'Bannon were in charge the ibDj would be all over it as a wise solution. The ibDj did eventually get around to telling the true story but, not until they decided to get dirty and throw some mud that was unnecessary. Also the Gov. has finally got the ball rolling many years after all the false starts. And don't forget about the route; it wasn't one that he selected he chose to use the one that o'bannon and kernan had settled on.
  • Asphalt was considered, not selected
    I think that INDOT are to be commended for considering asphalt. The article says that they did not select it because they had the foresight to look at long-term costs. Kudos for them to being open to the possibility and then making the best long-term decision!
  • True Savings
    What the article tells you is the immediate cost savings using asphalt. What it doesn't tell you is the long-term cost savings to every tax payer using concrete. Purdue is finalizing it's testing on a concrete using readily avaliable aggregates that will lengthen the life of concrete pavements to 100 years. This technology is here now, and it would be great to see I-69's pavement last into the next century. Indiana needs to utilize it's home grown inovations because in this instance we can't afford not to.
  • Bloomington's Arrogance
    I totally agree with Rob Clark. A few weeks ago I came through Bloomington on my way to Evansville. Traffic was terrible. Bloomington's elitist attitude in opposing I-69 is eroding taxpayer support for the university. I hope downstate legislators remember their attitude the next time my fellow academics have a pet project that cries out for state funding.
  • Maloney's Baloney-Send I-69 Through Bloomington
    IU-Bloomington possesses over a hundred billion dollars worth of taxpayers dollars in buildings, programs, faculty but the citizens of the state cannot access it because of the traffic congestion. That's because IU Bloomington does not want an expanded private sector that would come with the interstate which would someday compete to challenge its political hegemony over the city and its government which has done nearly nothing in 50 years to make it easier to travel to. They want all those taxpayer and private resources, sports, arts for themselves and don't want anyone else to share in them telling us go to Evansville via 2 hours out of our way via Terre Haute. I just want to get to and around Bloomington on fresmen move in day, sports/cultural events and Little 500 weekends without waiting two-three hours in traffic because 45/16 & SR 37 have not been updgraded. We desperately need an expressway/interstate to and around Bloomington, but the elites and by deault the people of Bloomington dont want to share our taxpayers built resources. Hats off to Danlies for innovation and determination in seeing this project through when Orr and O'Bannon promised and promised and never delivered.
  • Asphalt
    Asphalt may be a good substitute in parts of the south were there is not the continual frost/freeze cycle. Daniels and the State DOT are a bunch of morons...

    If we are going to do it lets do it right...If we are not going to do it right then do not do it.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.