IBJNews

Daniels cuts merit raises of top Purdue staff

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Purdue University President Mitch Daniels on Monday eliminated merit raises for administrators earning more than $50,000 annually over the next two years in the first in a series of cost-cutting moves to cover the estimated $40 million cost of freezing tuition rates through 2015.

Purdue posted a letter from Daniels on his web page Monday saying the move will apply to senior administrators, deans and administrative and professional staff. It will save the university $5 million over the next two years, he said.

"It has been too easy in higher education for institutions to decide first what they would like to spend, and then raise student bills to produce the desired funds. That approach has run its course," Daniels wrote in the letter. "At Purdue, we will make our first goal affordability, accommodating our spending to students' budgets and not the other way around."

The merit raise elimination doesn't apply to faculty or clerical and service staff, Purdue said.

Other cost-cutting moves will be announced in the coming weeks and will address expenses and practices across all central university units, Daniels said. Every academic, administrative and auxiliary unit of the campus will be asked to closely examine all activities and their costs.

The cost of the tuition freeze represents 1 percent to 2 percent of the university's base budget over the biennium, Daniels said, and Purdue should be able to cut more than that.

"I believe we should set our sights higher and work to create savings above the $40 million that can be used to augment our inadequate funds for scholarships and/or to extend the tuition freeze further," he wrote in his letter.

Daniels announced March 1 that it would freeze the cost of tuition at its main campus in West Lafayette over the next two years because of the lingering weak economy. The cost of basic in-state tuition there will remain about $10,000 a year until the end of the 2014-15 school year.

The last year without a tuition increase on the main campus was 1976.

Daniels became Purdue's president in January after completing two terms as Indiana's governor.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • discrimination?
    sounds like he is targeting the older and higher paid. trying to break them too? Ditch the Mitch!
  • "The Blade" is back at it
    My oldest kid went to Purdue for four years and his tuition went up, every single year, substantially, without any additional classes, services or benefits. And this was before the state really began to cut the increases in funding. Both undergraduate and graduate programs have gotten ridiculously expensive and many of the degrees do not have the value they once did. Daniels has his rivals, but I don't see how you can come out against this. Unless, of course, you work for Purdue. Remmember, he's not firing anyone and it's not like we have 6% inflation. I'll take action on him finding buckets of lard -- public universities have become huge bureaucracies which we pay for whether you're a taxpayer, student or alumnus.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT