IBJNews

Daniels: Stimulus should focus on companies, not states

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels said he opposes more stimulus such as aid to states to keep teachers hired and to expand credit to small business, while favoring incentives to revive private hiring and investment.

Increasing federal help for states amounts to “asking the citizens of responsible states like ours to subsidize those places who have been more reckless,” Daniels, a Republican who said he’s open to being a presidential candidate in 2012, said this week on the “Fox News Sunday” television program. It’s “not going to help the economy.”

President Barack Obama is leading a Democratic push to add $26 billion in spending to help states fund Medicaid and teachers’ salaries, and $30 billion for increasing credit and cutting taxes for small firms. The shortage of jobs is curtailing consumer spending, the biggest part of the economy, as the U.S. recovers from the worst recession since the 1930s.

Daniels said lawmakers should consider “perhaps even an emergency program that, while not raising taxes, opens the door or encourages investment.” Incentives for businesses that invest now, and speeding up regulatory approvals would encourage job-creating spending, he said.

Responding to a question about letting the Bush tax cuts expire for the wealthiest Americans, Daniels said it’s “hard to understand” why anybody would raise taxes in a recession. To cut the deficit, “the president, at least temporarily, should have impoundment power or some sort of an enhanced power” to reduce spending, said Daniels, who was budget director under former President George W. Bush in 2001.

Daniels said “we are practicing child abuse in a literal sense” by shifting Social Security and Medicare costs to future generations. He said he’d raise the retirement age to reflect modern survival and mortality numbers, and target benefits to those who really need them.

Democrats and Republicans need to create an “unusual consensus” to resolve the threats to long-term growth, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • re: go figure...
    Typical liberal tactic. I don't think I read anything where Daniel's supported firing or laying off teachers. If there are five people for every open job, the best way to improve that ratio is create more jobs. His point was investment in the private sector (which should focus on small businesses as he stated) will provide more job creation than throwing money at the public sector.
  • go figure...
    ...it's not bad enough that unemployment is through the roof. Now corporatist-Republicans like Daniels want to go after those already employed. Mmm, if there are five people for every open job in this country what would happen if we laid off teachers too? And, is he spouting off trickle-down economic theories again? Face it, folks. Guys like this are why the middle-class is disappearing.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

    2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

    3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

    4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

    5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

    ADVERTISEMENT