IBJNews

Daniels: Stimulus should focus on companies, not states

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels said he opposes more stimulus such as aid to states to keep teachers hired and to expand credit to small business, while favoring incentives to revive private hiring and investment.

Increasing federal help for states amounts to “asking the citizens of responsible states like ours to subsidize those places who have been more reckless,” Daniels, a Republican who said he’s open to being a presidential candidate in 2012, said this week on the “Fox News Sunday” television program. It’s “not going to help the economy.”

President Barack Obama is leading a Democratic push to add $26 billion in spending to help states fund Medicaid and teachers’ salaries, and $30 billion for increasing credit and cutting taxes for small firms. The shortage of jobs is curtailing consumer spending, the biggest part of the economy, as the U.S. recovers from the worst recession since the 1930s.

Daniels said lawmakers should consider “perhaps even an emergency program that, while not raising taxes, opens the door or encourages investment.” Incentives for businesses that invest now, and speeding up regulatory approvals would encourage job-creating spending, he said.

Responding to a question about letting the Bush tax cuts expire for the wealthiest Americans, Daniels said it’s “hard to understand” why anybody would raise taxes in a recession. To cut the deficit, “the president, at least temporarily, should have impoundment power or some sort of an enhanced power” to reduce spending, said Daniels, who was budget director under former President George W. Bush in 2001.

Daniels said “we are practicing child abuse in a literal sense” by shifting Social Security and Medicare costs to future generations. He said he’d raise the retirement age to reflect modern survival and mortality numbers, and target benefits to those who really need them.

Democrats and Republicans need to create an “unusual consensus” to resolve the threats to long-term growth, he said.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • re: go figure...
    Typical liberal tactic. I don't think I read anything where Daniel's supported firing or laying off teachers. If there are five people for every open job, the best way to improve that ratio is create more jobs. His point was investment in the private sector (which should focus on small businesses as he stated) will provide more job creation than throwing money at the public sector.
  • go figure...
    ...it's not bad enough that unemployment is through the roof. Now corporatist-Republicans like Daniels want to go after those already employed. Mmm, if there are five people for every open job in this country what would happen if we laid off teachers too? And, is he spouting off trickle-down economic theories again? Face it, folks. Guys like this are why the middle-class is disappearing.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. To get a pay raise, the teacher must score a "4" on a rubric that only has a "4' as the highest score. therefore all the administrator has to do is mark you a '3" in one area and no pay raise. My wife's evaluation "interestingly" now is lower than the last three years and no pay raise. My brother teaches around Indy where all of a sudden the highest score is 3.25 ie frozen pay raises.This is a faulty scoring system when a teacher would have to score perfect in all categories.Meanwhile, the administrators all got pay raises and two more were hired.It will be interesting to see what the administrators spouses score.
      The state needs a scoring system the rewards an effective teacher not a perfect teacher. I taught bfor 40 years and never used a scoring system that required perfection to reward my top students

    2. 'Floundering' would seem to indicate the sport is not long for the world. Sixteen years seems like a long time to 'flounder.'

      When one looks objectively at the metrics that matter; e.g., sponsorship, attendance an ratings, all are up.

      Is this another of those silly hater deals where you hold the sport of today up against the sport of twenty years ago then try some cutesy, childlike comparison to validate your little straw man?

      Here's another question: What is the specific purpose of television ratings?

    3. It will be really nice having another parking garage across the street from the two already on Illinois's east side. And there is another huge one just north of Michigan. If we fill in the surface lot north of Vermont and tear down that ridiculously old fashioned Rink Building we can achieve something few other municipalities can boast of: a 3 full city block canyon of parking garages.

      Plus, if there is a building downtown that merits imitation it is the One America tower. I propose it be the standard for all future design. And I propose we change our city name to Dystopolis.

    4. What is it on it's way back from? Pick one, let's discuss:

      - All oval series = FAILURE
      - Control AOW, Kill Sport = SUCCESS
      - Quality Field versus Quantity Field = FAILURE
      - Driver Death/Poor Chassis Design = FAILURE
      - More American/Less Foreign Drivers = FAILURE
      - More Street Courses/Less Ovals = SUCCESS
      - Merger/Asset Aquire with CCWS = SUCCESS
      - Penske wins all the time = SUCCESS
      - LOTUS barely is 3rd Manufacturer = FAILURE
      - Less Major Network TV/More Obscure TV = SUCCESS
      - Traditions Sacrificed for Survival = SUCCESS

      These are just a few topics....how is Indy on it's way back up?

    5. Chicken in a Biscuit

    ADVERTISEMENT