IBJNews

Daniels revises Purdue wage-freeze plan amid input

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Purdue University administrators earning more than $50,000 will be eligible for merit raises under a change to a plan President Mitch Daniels proposed last month to compensate for a two-year tuition freeze.

Daniels announced Tuesday that all employees will be eligible for 1-percent merit raises. His initial plan, announced in March, eliminated raises for senior administrators, deans and administrative and professional staff.

The plan is part of a series of cost-cutting moves designed to cover the estimated $40 million cost of freezing tuition rates through 2015. The last time Purdue went without a tuition increase on its main campus was 1976.

Daniels said the new plan will result in $7 million in savings through 2015. His initial plan would have saved $5 million.

"I'm convinced we have reached a far better outcome," Daniels said.

Daniels said he decided to make more employees eligible for merit raises after the second meeting of Purdue's new President's Council on Budget and Affordability. Purdue will tap an account previously budgeted to retain faculty and reward top performers to supplement the money already available for faculty raises.

Many administrators and faculty have offered to forego eligibility for their next raise or contribute to a fund that will replace the money that a tuition increase would have generated, according to a Purdue news release.

Council member David Williams hailed Daniels for listening to faculty input on the university's spending.

"I have been at Purdue for 40-plus years, and I believe we made history with the manner in which we reached this decision, for it has to be the first time Purdue faculty leaders had a say in how the university budget would be shaped," said Williams, vice chairman of the University Senate. "It truly is an example of shared governance."

The tuition freeze will keep the cost of basic in-state tuition in West Lafayette at about $10,000 a year,

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT