Daniels to sign bill defunding Planned Parenthood

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels said Friday he will sign restrictive abortion legislation and make Indiana the first state to cut off all government funding for Planned Parenthood, a move likely to boost his credentials among social conservatives as he considers whether to run for president.

Daniels said he supported the abortion restrictions from the outset and that the provision added to defund Planned Parenthood did not change his mind. He said women's health, family planning and other services will remain available.

"The principle involved commands the support of an overwhelming majority of Hoosiers," Daniels said in a statement announcing his intention to sign the bill when it arrives on his desk in about a week.

But the measure also puts Daniels' state at risk of losing $4 million a year in federal family planning grants likely to be cut off because of the legislation. Daniels, known as a fiscal hawk, did not address the loss in his statement.

The bill wasn't part of Daniels' agenda and he did not publicly advocate for the Planned Parenthood provision, but signing it might help his chances of winning the GOP nomination. Daniels opposes abortion rights, but his call for a Republican "truce" on social issues has drawn the ire of the social conservatives.

State Rep. Linda Lawson, a Democrat from Hammond who opposes the bill, said the legislation wouldn't win Daniels any friends among independents and women.

"It might be a maneuver, but I don't know if it's in his best interest," Lawson said.

Daniels said he has ordered Indiana's Family and Social Services Administration to ensure Medicaid recipients receive prompt notice of nearby care options.

"Any organization affected by this provision can resume receiving taxpayer dollars immediately by ceasing or separating its operations that perform abortions," Daniels said.

Planned Parenthood of Indiana had urged Daniels to veto the bill and started a series of statewide rallies against it Friday.

Daniels, 62, has said he will decide on a run for president after the Indiana Legislature adjourns, which is expected Friday. He's also said he will not have a decision this weekend.


  • Easy to Understand
    Actually, Tim seems to understand this pretty well. Planned Parenthood gets millions in taxpayer money. Planned Parenthood conducts more than 5,000 abortions a year in Indiana. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
  • Tim
    Tim, what is it in "it is illegal for taxpayer money to pay for abortions" you do not understand? This has been on the news for weeks. It is illegal by Federal law for any institution to use taxpayer money to pay for abortions. Planned Parenthood does not use taxpayer money to pay for abortions. They do use taxpayer money to help women (and their families) pay for other medical assistance. Surely you do not want to deny women to opportunity to fight cancer, etc.
    • Abortion is an elective procedure
      Rebecca Hagens, the great majority of abortions are elective procedures (except in case of rape or incest), and the taxpayer shouldnt support an institution that provides elective procedures. Next you will want the taxpayer to pay for facelifts and boob jobs for women too. Wake up.
    • mitch
      keep your laws off of my body
    • It's All About the Money
      Family planning rograms aren't going to be eliminated. There are non-profits that will jump in and fill the void. This is all about Planned Parenthood, a for profit group, using state and federal contracts to choke off competition. At the end of the day, they're will be more choices for family planning services due to the end of the PP monopoly.
    • Typical Liberal whining
      Typical Liberal whining. Howâ??s that hope and change working out for you obama has no leadership skills and skirts every issue not to mention how he is destroying this country
    • Jobs
      Please, Republicans, where are the jobs? You continue with your agenda to emphasize your ideology, but you have done absolutely nothing to help find jobs for Hoosiers. Governor Daniels, if you sign this bill your claim that it was not on your agenda is empty; by signing it you are a part of the movement. I think all the women that are now and in the future will/would use Planned Parenthood should just come to your office in the State House and ask you personally for assistance. Oh, by the way, Planned Parenthood didn't just help women; it helped families and that includes men and children. Now do we need to discuss the 4 million dollars per year you are turning down? And you claim to be fiscally responsible. Ha, just like so many politicians, you run for office on one platform and when in office work on another. So forget your ideology and find jobs for so many unemployed Hoosiers.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.