Daniels would consider post under GOP president

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, who decided last year against a presidential run, says he would consider serving in the cabinet of a new Republican president but believes it's "very improbable" the eventual nominee would tap him as a running mate.

Daniels made the comments Thursday during a wide-ranging interview with the editorial board of The Courier-Journal of Louisville, after he was asked if he would run for president if no other Republican candidate could defeat President Barack Obama in November.

"It just can't happen," Daniels said of entering the presidential campaign before adding that "it's very improbable" that the GOP nominee would ask him to run for vice president.

But Daniels, who is term-limited from seeking a third term as Indiana governor, said it would be a duty to consider a cabinet position if asked to serve.

"I don't think any citizen who thinks about it would say, if asked to serve, 'no,'" Daniels told The Courier-Journal during an hour-long, live-streamed interview.

Asked if he also would consider serving in a Democratic president's cabinet, Daniels said: "You have to give the same answer, whatever else you want to do, whatever else you're scheduled to do."

He added that the possibility of serving in a Democratic president's cabinet was "a new question" for him.

Daniels, the former federal budget director under President George W. Bush, was widely recruited to seek the presidency this year, but he said his family had discouraged him from running.

James McCann, a professor of political science at Purdue University, said he isn't surprised by Daniels' interest in a cabinet position. He said the end of Daniels' term as governor in January 2013 will leave him with a huge "question mark" about what career step to pursue next.

McCann said he believes the governor is measured and thoughtful in his public comments, so he has carefully crafted his response to questions about future positions.

"It sounds like he's leaving a lot open," McCann said.

Daniels also said Thursday that he will support whoever receives the Republican nomination to run against President Obama, saying the economy is "not improving fast enough."

Although the unemployment rate is declining, he warned that everybody should "keep the champagne on ice."

"We have a long, long way to go" on the economy, he said.


  • mitch-gop
    you are right-on, maybe he can help one of his gop buddies, get elected. the sooner he leaves office the better
  • uh-oh
    Lord, help us all........
  • Are you sure?
    Mitch, your tenure as a public servant has been an eye opener. As a board member of IPL, and worker at Lilly have proved to be devastating these corporations. As head of OMB you have taken us from a surplus to a deficit. You claimed the war would not cost us anything. As the Gov, our unemployment, gross income, education, fssa errors, and on and on have been just awful. Your buds, Timmy D, and Bales and your deal with IBM have made the people realize your inclinaitions. Furthermore, your job claims are nor reliable and you philosophy of giving to the rich and taking from the poor are well documented. In closing, socialize risk and privative profit is your matra. Go sell someone else down the river.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

    2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

    3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

    4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

    5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.