Parties near deal for hospital tax

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Officials from Indiana Medicaid and a hospital trade group are trying to craft a deal that would create a tax on hospitals that would help attract more federal funds for hospitals—thereby offsetting looming cuts in state payments.

The discussions have been ongoing between the Indiana Hospital Association and the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, the state agency that operates the Medicaid program for low-income Hoosiers.

Indiana Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said he’s pushing the two sides to reach an agreement by April 18, when he will introduce his budget to the Senate.

Kenley said the deal would help cushion the blow of cuts to Medicaid spending he sees as necessary to balance the state’s budget with its much-reduced level of tax revenue.

“We just feel pretty confident there are going to have to be some rate cuts,” Kenley said, adding, “We’re just trying to ease the pain a bit.”

Doug Leonard, president of the Indiana Hospital Association, is still hoping the deal can produce more revenue for hospitals.

“There are many details to be resolved, but such a program could be crafted as a win-win for all parties here in Indiana," he said in a statement.

Marcus Barlow, a spokesman for the Indiana FSSA, acknowledged that discussions are ongoing, but said there’s no concrete deal to report.

Medicaid is a federal-state program. Across all states, the feds pick up about two-thirds of Medicaid’s costs, with the states paying for the remaining 33 percent, according to data from the California-based Kaiser Family Foundation.

But Indiana, which has strict eligibility ceilings, pays only 26.5 percent of Medicaid’s costs.

States can draw more federal money by boosting how much they put into the program. Currently, Indiana Medicaid reimbursements are about 60 percent of what the federal Medicare program for seniors pays—which is roughly equivalent to the cost of providing care. That means hospitals lose money on every Medicaid patient.

So the hospital tax would pull money from the hospitals to boost Indiana Medicaid spending, thereby bringing in more federal money and giving the hospitals more funding than they paid in tax.

The trouble is, the state needs some of the Medicaid money to plug its budget holes. So the hospital tax discussions are now hung up on how much the state keeps—and whether the hospitals actually stand to get more funding, or merely avoid losing revenue.

When asked whether the hospitals might get more revenue as part of the deal, Kenley said, “Or at least not come out a loser.”

Such assessment fees have been discussed in the past, most intensely in 2007. But there has been a common sticking point between hospitals serving poorer areas—where there are many Medicaid patients—and those in wealthy suburbs, which serve few Medicaid patients. The former would stand to gain funding from a hospital tax while the latter would lose.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.