Deal would set 40 as Indiana alcohol ID age

Associated Press
April 27, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State legislators have reached an agreement on changing Indiana's much-ridiculed law requiring everyone — regardless of age — to provide identification when buying carry-out alcohol.

Bill sponsor Republican Sen. James Merritt of Indianapolis said Wednesday that he would accept a proposal to no longer require store clerks to card customers who appear older than 40.

Merritt had backed making the carding age 50, but he said setting it at 40 had the most support among legislators.

The proposal would revise a law that took effect last summer and immediately generated complaints from senior citizens and others who said it made no sense. Liquor store owners support the current law, saying it has discouraged minors from trying to buy alcohol.


  • Pointless
    The funny thing about this is that there is no law in Indiana requiring an ID to drink in a bar. The law states that the bar MUST KNOW that you are 21. This means that if a friend of mine comes into my bar and forgot his or her ID, yet I know for a fact that they are of age, then they can drink legally with no ID. Therefore, I just don't get why they would make this a law for off premise (carry-out) alcohol. Just severely punish anyone who serves an underage person, rather than make a senior citizen prove his or her age.
  • When did buying alcohol become a "right"?
    So when did buying alcohol become a "right" in our country? Some people better learn the difference between what a right is, and what a priveledge is. Seriously. If you dont know, look it up. And who are the people roaming the streets without a form of identification? Who doesnt have a form of ID, and what would be the reason for not having one? Such simple little things in this country absolutely puzzle me. Drinking age is 21, you should simply show a form of ID when buying your damn liquor, regardless of age. End of story. Im literally surrounded by idiots!
  • Let me understand this
    We are in the last week of the legistlature and they are taking time to pass a law that makes sure anyone who appears to be less than 40 must show an I.D. to buy a beer in a store on any day except Sunday.
    Nice work. What was that about the 10 percent unemployment?
  • Stupid
    This law is a prime example of the stupidity of the Indiana State Legislature. We have a law the does not allow anyone under 21 years of age to buy liquor. That is the law the state should uphold. Asking anyone who is clearly over that age for an ID is complete unadulterated stupidity and an infringement of a person's rights. Why not have everyone show their ID when they buy gas? You have to be over a certain age to drive a car and we know how dangerous unlicensed drivers can be. Maybe we should just have a law to have the Indiana State Legislators show that they have an IQ over 100. That should get rid of most of them.
  • Rights
    You are in error, Buying booze is a right. This is still a free country, and for someone over 65 to have to show ID to prove he/she is over 21 in an infringement of my rights. Until this law changes, we buy booze in Illinois
  • too many exemptions
    My litmus test for all new laws is if this:

    if there is an exemption to the a it is a bad law.

    Seriously, buying booze is not a right. Show you flipping ID it aint hard and cleans up any abiguity.
    • Seriously Folks
      Checking everyone's ID seems to be the most fair and undisputable measure of a person's age. What does 40 years old look like. If I am not mistaken, there is theatricle makeup that can make someone look like an old man. Adults are supposed to always carry identification anyway. I applauded the always card rule. This rule makes sense. It just takes an adjustment period. I was a server/bartender in a restuarant. With the law being card everyone, that protected me from discussions from patrons claiming no ID. Simply I must card everyone. Seriously folks, is it that hard to show your ID? I gladly show mine everytime.
    • Great work! Why bother trying to fix gas prices or unemployment when they can card 40-year olds
    • It's great to see...
      this is a priority for the session. Great work, everyone.
    • Step in the right direction
      Thank you, Indiana State Legislature, for making a small stride towards common sense.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

    2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

    3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

    4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

    5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....