IBJNews

Deals up, dollars down in 2013 for Indiana life sciences firms

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A record number of Hoosier life sciences companies secured financing in 2013—but the total money they raised was only half as much as the year before.

According to data from BioEnterprise, an Ohio-based life sciences development group, venture capitalists and angel investors put a combined $31.9 million into 18 life sciences companies last year.

That compared to $64.7 million invested in 11 companies in 2012, according to BioEnterprise data.

Warsaw-based Nextremity Solutions, an orthopedic-implant maker, attracted the largest investment—$10 million from Rockport Venture Partners. After that, the next-largest hauls went to these Indianapolis-based firms:

-    hc1.com, a provider of customer relationship management software for health care providers: $4.64 million from undisclosed investors.
-    FAST BioMedical, a maker of diagnostic tests for hospital patients: $3.33 million from Elevate Ventures and angel investors.
-    Wellfount Corp., maker of health information technology for nursing home pharmacies: $2.5 million from undisclosed investors.
-    ApeX Therapeutics, which is developing drugs for cancer and eye disease: $2.5 million from BioCrossroads.
-    AgeneBio, which is developing Alzheimer’s therapies: $2 million from angel investors.

A list of all 2013 life sciences deals in the Midwest can be found here.

The number of companies receiving money last year was the highest state total since BioEnterprise began keeping statistics on Midwestern life sciences investments in 2005. The previous record was 16 companies in 2010.

Deal flow was a tick higher in the Indianapolis region. Eleven area companies attracted investments, more than in any year since 2005. In 2012, 10 Indianapolis-area life sciences firms attracted investments.

In 2013, a total of $20.6 million was invested in life sciences companies in the Indianapolis area. That was down from 2012, when the statewide haul of $64.7 million was boosted by Strand Analytical's securing $30 million and Esanex, a spinout of Eli Lilly and Co., attracting $15 million.

The trends in Indiana were mirrored across the Midwest, where the number of companies receiving investments rose to 217 last year from 182 the year before. But total investments fell to $758.4 million from $995.7 million the year before.

“Overall, Midwest health care investment activity reflects the nationwide decrease in health care investing,” said Aram Merpouni, CEO of BioEnterprise, in a prepared statement. But, noting the record number of deals across the Midwest, he added, “The Midwest has developed a robust pipeline of high-quality companies.”

BioEnterprise collects investment data from 10 Midwestern states and the western portion of Pennsylvania around Pittsburgh. Combined, the region had a population in the 2010 Census of nearly 72 million people. Indiana accounted for 9 percent of that population.

But Indiana continues to grab an undersized portion of the Midwest’s life sciences investments. Its share of the Midwest pie last year was 4.2 percent. And its average of the past nine years has been just 6.2 percent.

Hoosier companies receiving investments last year, as a percentage of all Midwestern life sciences investments, was 8.3 percent—closer to Indiana’s share of the region’s population. Indiana’s share of deals over the past nine years has averaged 6.9 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Only half a million TV Viewers? And thats an increase? I knew Indycar was struggling but I didn't know it was that bad. Hell, if NASCAR hits 5 Million viewers everyone starts freaking out saying its going down hill. It has a long way to before Indycar even hits NASCAR's bad days.

  2. IU has been talking that line for years with no real progress even with the last Dean, Dr. Brater. Why will an outsider, Dr. Hess, make a difference? With no proof of additional resources (cash in the bank), and a concrete plan to move an academic model that has been outdated for decades with a faculty complacent with tenure and inertia, I can count on IU to remain the same during the tenure of Dr. Hess. One ought to look to Purdue and Notre Dame for change and innovation. It is just too bad that both of those schools do not have their own medical school. Competition might wake up IU. My guess is, that even with those additions to our State, IU will remain in its own little world squandering our State's tax dollars. Why would any donor want to contribute to IU with its track record? What is its strategy to deal with the physician shortage for our State? New leadership will not be enough for us to expect any change.

  3. How do you think the Bridges got approved? I spent a couple days researching PAC's and individual contributions to some city council members during that time. My printouts were inches thick on the two I concentrated on. Finally gave up. Was disgusted with all the donations, and who they were from. Would have taken me days and days to compile a complete list. Tried to give it to the Star reporter, but he thought it was all just fine. (and apparently he was treated well himself) He ended up being laid off or fired though. And then of course, there was land donated to the dad's club, or city, as a partial payoff. All done in the shining example of "charity." No, none of these contributions are a coincidence.

  4. I agree what kind of help or if any will be there for Dr. Ley's patients. I was a patient myself.

  5. What about the hundreds of patients who sought this doctor for the right reasons, to quit drugs. what option do these patients now have, experience horrible withdrawl or return to heroin?? those are the choices. what about the children of these former addicts who's parent(s) WILL not b able to maintain their job, for @ least 2 weeks.. There needs to b an emergency clinic opened for these patients.

ADVERTISEMENT