Decade-old Heartland fraud case nearing end

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A 10-year-old federal lawsuit involving a local investment firm that bilked investors out of $29 million in a Ponzi scheme finally is drawing to a close.

The court-appointed receiver charged with distributing the assets of Kenneth R. Payne and others involved with Heartland Financial Services Inc. filed a motion on March 8 to disperse the last of the money to investors.

James Knauer so far has distributed more than $2.6 million to 455 investors and creditors, and notified a U.S. District Court judge in Indianapolis that just $75,274 remains. The amount left for investors is even smaller when accounting for $28,132 in attorney's fees and $9,921 in receiver fees he is requesting.

The return for investors breaks down to almost 9 cents for every dollar invested, which is better than average for most fraud cases, said local attorney Mark Maddox, who represented several of the ripped-off investors.

“It looked to me that Knauer did a good job going out and looking for every dollar he could find,” he said. “But unfortunately, most of the bad guys end up spending all of the money.”

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission brought its lawsuit against Payne, now 61, and others involved in Indianapolis-based Heartland in August 2000. Payne, though, fled the United States and was apprehended by federal marshals in Cancun, Mexico, a month later. Investigators said Payne made preparations to assume a second identity and possessed a supply of loose diamonds to finance his new life.

He pleaded guilty to five counts of mail fraud and one count of money laundering, and was sentenced in April 2002 to 17 years and seven months in federal prison. He currently is incarcerated in Texas. Payne also was ordered to pay restitution of more than $27 million for orchestrating the Ponzi scheme.

The SEC accused Payne and others of defrauding investors, many of whom were elderly, through bogus investment opportunities that included interests in an offshore bank in Belize.

Knauer recovered some offshore money and seized personal assets, including homes, automobiles, motorcycles and boats, which is “real typical” in these types of cases, he said.

But, similar to what’s occurring in the Bernie Madoff scheme, he also sued investors who profited from their investments.

“If you get paid late in the game, you’re getting someone else’s money,” Knauer said. “The fairest thing was to go after the profits the people made.”

Brad Skolnik, a former state securities commissioner, recalled the scheme as one of the more high-profile securities cases he was involved in during his eight-year tenure.

“Unfortunately, Ken Payne left a lot of victims in his wake,” he said. “I’m not at all surprised to see that the receiver is still taking steps to locate assets.”

The magnitude of the case may be most evident in a local storage facility, where 147 seized boxes of records sit. The cost of monthly storage is $38.43, which is included in the attorney's fees Knauer is seeking.

Knauer wants the storage facility to destroy the boxes, at a cost of $4.88 each, or a total of nearly $718.

“The receiver requests that notice of the filing of this motion be given to Mr. Kenneth Payne on behalf of Heartland’s principals and, unless Mr. Payne or someone on his behalf is willing to assume the continuing storage costs of the Heartland records, then the receiver should be authorized to have the storage facility destroy the boxes,” Knauer wrote to the court.


  • Kenneth Payne in jail
    I remember Ken Payne at Indiana University in the late 60's and early 70's. always was a sleazy guy not at all surprised mhe is in jail. A man totally lacking any morality.
  • Why no arrest of Tim Durham et al
    Maybe the guys quoted can explain why Tim and his friends have not been arrested.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing