IBJNews

DePauw University gets $31M in donations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

DePauw University announced Monday it accepted $31 million in donations, including a $20 million donation from the founder of Lincoln Capital Management and his wife to provide financial aid to students.

The donation from Timothy and Sharon W. Ubben, both 1958 graduates of the school, was formally accepted along with the other donations by the university board of trustees over the weekend. Timothy Ubben, who was co-chairman of the school's board of trustees from 1998 to 2001, said he and his wife made the gift to be part of the future.

"We have been so impressed with the many DePauw students we have come to know over the years and we believe it is essential that we ensure that all well-qualified students have an opportunity to attend this university," he said.

Ubben founded Lincoln Capital Management, a Chicago-based investment firm, in 1967 and retired as chairman in 1999.

The school on Monday also announced it received two anonymous gifts totaling $7 million, which will be used to improve athletic and recreational facilities, including the installation of synthetic turf on the football field at Blackstock Stadium. The money also will be used to help pay for the first phase of the university's athletic facility master plan, which calls for a new 16,000-square-foot fitness facility that will serve varsity athletic teams and be the primary recreational fitness facility for students, faculty and staff.

The school announced a $2 million gift Kenneth and Carrie Melind Coquillette, 1982 graduates, to fund new career planning programs. Kenneth Coquillette, a managing director at Goldman, Sachs & Co. in Chicago, is a member of the university's board of trustees.

The school received two more $1 million gifts to renovate three historic homes near the university entrance and to restore the grounds surrounding East College, Holton Memorial Quadrangle and the north lawn of East College.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT