IBJNews

Developer of Binford Medical Complex files for Chapter 11

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The developer of an unfinished medical office complex on Binford Boulevard has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in hopes it can retain control of the property and resume construction later this year, four years after the principal lender went bankrupt and sent the project into limbo.

Binford Medical Developers LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization early this month to prevent a forced sale of the 17-acre property at 65th Street and Binford Boulevard to collect unpaid property taxes. The move buys time for the developer to close on a settlement with its original construction lender and a new loan to finish the first building in the so-called Binford Medical Complex, company principal Ken Schmidt said.

The first building in the $32-million, five-building complex was about 95 percent complete when lender USA Capital filed for bankruptcy in April 2006. By that point, USA Capital had provided only $7.4 million of an $8.5 million loan it had promised.

Schmidt hasn't paid interest on the loan since 2006, as he awaited a settlement. The biggest hurdle to reaching terms: USA Capital was funded by thousands of small investors, and 92 of them are listed on the title for the Binford Medical property.

The developer has landed a new loan that will set aside $1 million to finish the first building, along with funds to settle with the 92 investors in the original loan. Schmidt said the investors agreed to take less than they're owed, but he declined to provide details.

Schmidt hopes to reach a separate settlement with county officials over an unpaid $129,000 tax bill. He plans to dispute the assessed property value, arguing the property has sat mostly vacant.

The 47,000-square-foot existing building has only two tenants: a 4,300-square-foot urgent care center that continues to pay rent but has not been open for business, and Seward Sales Corp., which occupies about 2,200 square feet.

Schmidt, who has developed 22 smaller office and industrial buildings in the area, said he has leases lined up for 75 percent of the building once it is complete. He also has a commitment from one tenant to take an entire new building in the complex.

Future buildings in the complex would be built as soon as financing and demand come together. Medical office has been a strong sector of commercial real estate, and the project should benefit from its location on a major corridor not far from Community North.

"I buried my own money ($6 million) in this project," he said. "The only way I can get my money back or a portion back is to build out, lease up and get the whole project completed."

The Chapter 11 case was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana on Oct. 6. Binford Medical Developers lists assets of less than $50,000 against liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 75%? Really?
    I doubt that there is sincere tenant interest for 35,000 SF in this building. If that was the case, it would already be filled. If the existing urgent care facility ceases operations, clearly there is a problem with the location or demographics. Instead of chasing Dr's as tenants, maybe they should be chasing a mortuary tenant.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT