Developer of Binford Medical Complex files for Chapter 11

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The developer of an unfinished medical office complex on Binford Boulevard has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in hopes it can retain control of the property and resume construction later this year, four years after the principal lender went bankrupt and sent the project into limbo.

Binford Medical Developers LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization early this month to prevent a forced sale of the 17-acre property at 65th Street and Binford Boulevard to collect unpaid property taxes. The move buys time for the developer to close on a settlement with its original construction lender and a new loan to finish the first building in the so-called Binford Medical Complex, company principal Ken Schmidt said.

The first building in the $32-million, five-building complex was about 95 percent complete when lender USA Capital filed for bankruptcy in April 2006. By that point, USA Capital had provided only $7.4 million of an $8.5 million loan it had promised.

Schmidt hasn't paid interest on the loan since 2006, as he awaited a settlement. The biggest hurdle to reaching terms: USA Capital was funded by thousands of small investors, and 92 of them are listed on the title for the Binford Medical property.

The developer has landed a new loan that will set aside $1 million to finish the first building, along with funds to settle with the 92 investors in the original loan. Schmidt said the investors agreed to take less than they're owed, but he declined to provide details.

Schmidt hopes to reach a separate settlement with county officials over an unpaid $129,000 tax bill. He plans to dispute the assessed property value, arguing the property has sat mostly vacant.

The 47,000-square-foot existing building has only two tenants: a 4,300-square-foot urgent care center that continues to pay rent but has not been open for business, and Seward Sales Corp., which occupies about 2,200 square feet.

Schmidt, who has developed 22 smaller office and industrial buildings in the area, said he has leases lined up for 75 percent of the building once it is complete. He also has a commitment from one tenant to take an entire new building in the complex.

Future buildings in the complex would be built as soon as financing and demand come together. Medical office has been a strong sector of commercial real estate, and the project should benefit from its location on a major corridor not far from Community North.

"I buried my own money ($6 million) in this project," he said. "The only way I can get my money back or a portion back is to build out, lease up and get the whole project completed."

The Chapter 11 case was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana on Oct. 6. Binford Medical Developers lists assets of less than $50,000 against liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.


  • 75%? Really?
    I doubt that there is sincere tenant interest for 35,000 SF in this building. If that was the case, it would already be filled. If the existing urgent care facility ceases operations, clearly there is a problem with the location or demographics. Instead of chasing Dr's as tenants, maybe they should be chasing a mortuary tenant.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.