Docs fear reform will exacerbate ER overuse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of the most agreed-upon reasons for health care reform was the expensive overuse of the emergency room by uninsured patients. But two Hoosier ER docs—one conservative, one liberal—say the implementation of health reform will leave that fundamental problem unresolved.

The health reform bill signed into law Tuesday by President Obama would expand insurance coverage to 92 percent of Americans by 2019. But of the 32 million extra Americans expected to have insurance coverage, half would be covered by an expansion of Medicaid, a federal-state program that pays woefully low rates to doctors and hospitals.

Medicaid in Indiana pays doctors about 60 percent of what it costs them to provide services, according to a December study by Seattle-based Milliman Inc. The new law would raise eligibility for Medicaid from families of four making just $5,500 a year to families of four making up to $29,000 a year. The state has much higher income caps to allow disabled and older adults, pregnant women and children whose parents are poor to enroll in Medicaid.

Dr. John McGoff, an ER doctor at Community Health Network in Indianapolis, noted that Medicaid includes few disincentives for enrollees who use the emergency room.

“I think you’re going to see utilization rates go through the roof. Whatever they’ve used as their actuarial cost on this will be a gross under-representation,” he said.

McGoff, a Republican who is trying to unseat Rep. Dan Burton (R-Indiana) in a race for Congress, thinks Obama’s health reforms are so bad he wants them repealed.

But his assessment of the impact on ERs is largely shared by Dr. Rob Stone, an ER doctor at Bloomington Hospital who supported Obama’s reforms even though he thinks they don’t go far enough.

Health reform would raise payments to primary care doctors to equal the rates paid by the federal Medicare program, which are roughly on par with doctors’ costs. That should help alleviate some of the burden as more doctors accept Medicaid patients.

But with Indiana and the nation already suffering a shortage of primary-care doctors, neither McGoff nor Stone expects there to be enough new doctors to cover the influx of new customers. Besides, doctors may gravitate to accept the 16 million new people who will buy private insurance through the state-based exchanges that will open in 2014.

“If more people go on Medicaid, but they can’t find a primary-care doctor, and they feel more free to come into the ER, then that’s going to load us up,” Stone said. “So that’s not so good.”

The American College of Emergency Physicians agrees. The group’s president, Angela Gardner, said in a statement Monday, “As we have seen in Massachusetts, though, health insurance coverage does not equal access to medical care, and emergency visits are increasing in that state. This means critical problems facing emergency patients are not going away.”

McGoff does think he will personally make more money under Obama’s reforms. He said one in four patients he sees is uninsured and pays little to none of his or her bill. If more people have at least Medicaid coverage, as poorly as it pays, he would likely come out ahead.

But Stone isn’t sure the patients will. He worries that it will still be difficult to find doctors he can refer patients to for the follow-up care they need after he sees them in the emergency room.

“Expanding Medicaid is not a great floor. It’s a creaky floor with a lot of holes in it. It’s going to cover too few people and take too long to do it,” Stone said, adding, “That’s why the work’s not done.”

Stone thinks the only way to truly provide access to care for all Americans is to expand the Medicare program for seniors, or something very like it, to all Americans.

McGoff thinks the government should provide subsidies for catastrophic care for all Americans only up to a certain income threshold. Smaller medical bills should be handled with privately purchased health savings accounts. And the cost of care and coverage, he said, should be reined in with caps on medical malpractice damages and the ability to buy health insurance across state lines.

“Selfishly, I should be in favor of this. But in reality, I’m dead set against it,” he said of the new health law. “I think this will further bankrupt a system that’s already bankrupt.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.