IBJNews

Dow Agro plans 'major' expansion announcement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard are expected to be on hand for what officials are caling a "major life sciences expansion" announcement Thursday morning at Dow AgroSciences headquarters.

The company, a subsidiary of Midland, Mich.-based giant Dow Chemical Co., declined to share details about its plans in advance of the press conference, but Dow AgroSciences spokeswoman Kenda Resler Friend said the event is “more significant than what we announced last summer.”

Last July, the company signed a 15-year lease for a newly constructed 80,000-square-foot research and development building adjacent to its headquarters in the northwestern corner of Indianapolis. At the time, Dow AgroSciences pledged to hire dozens of additional researchers to staff the new facility. Dow Agro employs about 1,200 locally.

The Indianapolis operation is poised for significant growth, and has been touting its plans to double research and development investment by 2012. In a Feb. 10 speech to the Goldman Sachs Agricultural Biotech Forum in New York, Dow AgroSciences CEO Antonio Galindez said Dow AgroSciences anticipates launching five new agrochemical products by 2012. The products will generate more than $800 million in new sales, he said.

For example, Sulfoxaflor, a new insecticide, has a projected 2012 launch and will be the first biotechnology product in a $2 billion market. This year, Dow AgroSciences will launch SmartStax, the world’s first nine-gene seed trait combination for corn growers. The company says it can increase crop yields by up to 10 percent by protecting them against herbicides and bugs.

“We are ramping up or planning to launch five new products,” Galindez told the New York audience. “When you consider it takes more than $180 million and nine to 10 years to bring a new molecule to market, you can see our R&D machine is really rolling.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

ADVERTISEMENT