IBJNews

Dow Agro plans 'major' expansion announcement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard are expected to be on hand for what officials are caling a "major life sciences expansion" announcement Thursday morning at Dow AgroSciences headquarters.

The company, a subsidiary of Midland, Mich.-based giant Dow Chemical Co., declined to share details about its plans in advance of the press conference, but Dow AgroSciences spokeswoman Kenda Resler Friend said the event is “more significant than what we announced last summer.”

Last July, the company signed a 15-year lease for a newly constructed 80,000-square-foot research and development building adjacent to its headquarters in the northwestern corner of Indianapolis. At the time, Dow AgroSciences pledged to hire dozens of additional researchers to staff the new facility. Dow Agro employs about 1,200 locally.

The Indianapolis operation is poised for significant growth, and has been touting its plans to double research and development investment by 2012. In a Feb. 10 speech to the Goldman Sachs Agricultural Biotech Forum in New York, Dow AgroSciences CEO Antonio Galindez said Dow AgroSciences anticipates launching five new agrochemical products by 2012. The products will generate more than $800 million in new sales, he said.

For example, Sulfoxaflor, a new insecticide, has a projected 2012 launch and will be the first biotechnology product in a $2 billion market. This year, Dow AgroSciences will launch SmartStax, the world’s first nine-gene seed trait combination for corn growers. The company says it can increase crop yields by up to 10 percent by protecting them against herbicides and bugs.

“We are ramping up or planning to launch five new products,” Galindez told the New York audience. “When you consider it takes more than $180 million and nine to 10 years to bring a new molecule to market, you can see our R&D machine is really rolling.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT