IBJNews

Dow AgroSciences' profit rises despite lower revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Dow AgroSciences' first-quarter profit increased nearly 6 percent, to $384 million, over the same period of 2009, primarily due to higher profit margins from a stronger mix of products, the company said Wednesday morning.

Strong farmer acceptance of new products and seed acquisitions partially offset the impact of unseasonably cold spring weather across the northern part of the globe and continued pricing pressure on certain agricultural chemicals, Dow AgroSciences said.

Revenue dipped 8 percent, to $1.3 billion, from $1.4 billion in the first quarter of 2009, due to an oversupply of glyphosate, which hurt demand for the herbicide.

Meanwhile, Dow AgroSciences’ parent company, Midland, Mich.-based Dow Chemical Co., on Wednesday reported its best quarterly results in more than a year as it benefited from growing demand and price increases.

Profit rose to $466 million from just $24 million in the first quarter a year ago. The nation's largest chemical maker said the results show that demand is growing in developed markets, which were hit hardest by the recession. Strong growth in emerging markets continues to boost the manufacturing sector, Dow said.

“Overall the global economic environment is on a stronger footing and there are signs that this will continue for the foreseeable future,” CEO Andrew Liveris said in a statement. “This is good news for Dow.”

On a per-share basis, profit rose to 41 cents per share, after paying preferred dividends, from 3 cents per share, in the same quarter last year. Excluding certain items, Dow earned 43 cents per share.

Revenue rose 48 percent, to $13.42 billion from $9.04 billion.

Wall Street expected earnings of 30 cents per share on $12.9 billion in revenue, according to a Thomson Reuters survey.

Dow Chemical raised prices by 17 percent in the first quarter and logged a 16-percent increase in sales volumes as demand grew across all of its regions.

Revenue gains were led by higher sales in its basic plastics business, which posted a 49-percent sales increase. Performance products revenue climbed 41 percent.

Revenue in its electronic and specialty-materials segment and its performance-systems unit rose 30 percent, while revenue from its coatings and infrastructure business grew 21 percent.

Last year, Dow acquired Rohm & Haas for $16.5 billion to expand into the more profitable specialty chemicals business. The company said the acquisition and cost cuts allowed it to save $275 million in the period.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT