Drugmakers call off animal-health deal, possible asset sale

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Drugmakers Merck & Co. and Sanofi-Aventis SA said Tuesday they have abandoned plans to combine their animal-health businesses after wrestling with regulators for a year over potential divestitures.

Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. was among a list of possible suitors for about $1 billion in assets the two companies considered selling to resolve antitrust concerns.

Lilly has been trying to grow its animal-health business through acquisitions in order to build up revenue expected to be lost late this year when its bestselling human drug Zyprexa faces competition from cheaper generic copies.

Earlier this month, Lilly’s Elanco animal-health division agreed to acquire Jannsen Animal Health, a subsidiary of New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Merck and Sanofi’s decision ends a plan to create the world’s biggest maker of medicines for livestock and pets. The drugmakers were to have been equal owners of the joint venture announced last March. The units had combined sales of $5.5 billion last year.

“It was clear from the beginning that there would be problems from the regulatory side,” said Oliver Kaemmerer, an analyst with WestLB AG in London. Kaemmerer said he believes Merck and Sanofi when they say they won’t sell their animal- health assets, but “never say never.”

For now, the companies will keep the Merial and Intervet units separate at no penalty to either side. Merck, based in Whitehouse Station, N.J., and Paris-based Sanofi remain committed to animal health, they said in a statement.

Merial’s products include a bird-flu vaccine for poultry and Frontline, the best-selling flea spray for pets, while Intervet makes a device to vaccinate pigs without a needle and the Safe-Guard treatment to deworm dogs.

“The companies are discontinuing their agreement primarily because of the increasing complexity of implementing the proposed transaction, both in terms of the nature and extent of the anticipated divestitures and the length of time necessary for the worldwide regulatory review process,” Merck and Sanofi said in the statement.

The two companies had hired Morgan Stanley to arrange the sale of assets valued at about $1 billion to resolve antitrust concerns, two sources with knowledge of the matter said in October. Prospective buyers may have included Lilly, Pfizer Inc., Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH and Novartis AG, the sources said.

Potential buyers showed a lot of interest in the assets, Sanofi Chief Executive Officer Chris Viehbacher said on a Feb. 9 conference call.

Sanofi and Merck operated Merial as a joint venture for more than a decade. Sanofi bought out its partner’s stake for $4 billion in 2009, removing an antitrust obstacle to Merck’s acquisition of Schering-Plough Corp.

Merck and Sanofi agreed a year ago form a new partnership that combined Merial and the Intervet veterinary unit that Merck got in the Schering-Plough purchase.

Viehbacher sought to expand in veterinary products in part because the business wasn’t as vulnerable as prescription drugs to competition from generic products. Growing demand for food also helped lift sales of products for farm animals, and rising incomes were leading to increased pet ownership, he said.

“This is one of those sweet spots that provide sustainability of sales and earnings growth,” Viehbacher said on the Feb. 9 call.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1