IBJNews

Duke Energy earnings creep up on higher rates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Energy Corp.’s earnings rose 2 percent in the second quarter on higher electric rates, but newly acquired subsidiary Progress Energy saw earnings plummet as a result of planned nuclear plant outages.

Duke said Thursday that it earned $444 million, or 99 cents per share, on revenue of $3.58 billion in the quarter. Last year, the company earned $435 million, or 98 cents per share, in the period on revenue of $3.53 billion.

Adjusted to eliminate the effect of a recent stock split and merger costs, Duke earned $1.02 per share. Analysts expected Duke to earn 97 cents per share, according to FactSet.

Duke Chief Financial Officer Lynn Good called the quarter “extraordinary” in an interview. Duke’s biggest division, regulated utilities that deliver power to customers in the Carolinas, saw earnings rise because regulators there allowed Duke to charge customers more for electricity. Also, last year the company was hurt by high storm-related maintenance costs.

This is the first quarter that Duke has reported earnings as the nation’s largest utility, a month after it completed what became an acrimonious combination with in-state rival Progress Energy.

“They needed a good quarter to brighten the mood around there,” said Andy Smith, an analyst at Edward Jones. “It’s something they want and needed to get the attention on the actual results.”

Duke reported results for Progress, which it acquired July 2, separately. Progress’s net income fell 64 percent on higher operating costs because it had to shut down three nuclear reactors in the Carolinas to refuel them.

Duke reported that Progress earned $63 million, or 21 cents per share, on revenue of $2.27 billion in the quarter. Last year Progress earned $176 million on revenue of $2.26 billion.

In a surprise move only hours after the deal between Duke and Progress was completed, Duke’s new board members voted to oust the CEO it had just named — former Progress CEO Bill Johnson. They replaced him with Jim Rogers, who had been Duke’s CEO but was slated to become executive chairman after the close of the deal.

In the wake of the switch, top executives and board members who had come to Duke from Progress as part of the deal have resigned, and North Carolina’s utilities regulator has launched an investigation into the deal to determine if the state was misled during the merger approval process. Duke board members who have testified in the case say the board lost confidence in Johnson’s ability to lead the company.

In an interview Thursday, Duke CEO Jim Rogers blamed Progress’s poor second quarter results on unique timing issues — with three nuclear reactors down at once for refueling, Progress wasn’t able to generate as much power as a year earlier.

But the poor results may help Duke’s board defend its decision to remove Johnson.

Rogers said that despite the management turmoil, the integration of the two companies is going well. “We have our 350 top leaders in place, and they are focused on results,” he said. “I’m very pleased with the way people are pulling together.”

The rancor between Duke and regulators prompted Standard & Poor’s to downgrade the company’s debt. Duke is scheduled to ask regulators for a rate increase this year, and the poor relationship between regulators and the company hangs over those negotiations.

Rogers doesn’t think it will have any affect. “We expect they will address each case on its merit,” he said.

Duke, based in Charlotte, N.C., is the largest U.S. utility, with 7.1 million residential and business customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana and Florida.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT