Duke Energy puts local CEO on leave amid state probe

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Energy Corp. placed Mike Reed, president and CEO of its Indiana operations, on administrative leave Tuesday afternoon in the wake of a state investigation that involves the company and resulted in the dismissal of the chairman of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.

Earlier in the day, Gov. Mitch Daniels fired IURC chief David Lott Hardy for allegedly allowing an agency official to continue presiding over a Duke Energy case even after talking with the utility about a job opportunity.

The governor in an announcement Tuesday morning said he was immediately replacing Hardy with Jim Atterholt as chairman of the IURC. Atterholt serves on the IURC and is the state’s former insurance commissioner.

The firing of Hardy follows the recent departure to Duke’s Plainfield office of Scott Storms, who had been administrative law judge for the IURC. Storms was presiding over a handful of cases involving Duke, including matters involving cost overruns at Duke’s Edwardsport generating plant.

Duke said Tuesday it was also putting Storms on administrative leave from his position in Duke’s legal-regulatory department. Reed and Storms will be on leave “pending the completion of a full evaluation,” Duke said in an announcement.

Storms and Duke previously sought an advisory opinion from the state ethics commission on whether Storms would be subject to a one-year cooling-off period from employment at Duke. The ethics commission said the cooling-off period didn’t apply to Storms, but rather to IURC commissioners involved in direct decision-making.

Critics, including the Citizens Action Coalition, said Storms, even as an administrative law judge, made critical decisions, such as whether or not to admit key evidence in utility cases.

David Pippen, Daniels' general counsel, said an internal review found that Storms was communicating with Duke about a job even while he was presiding over administrative hearings concerning Duke.

"Additionally, the agency head (Hardy) was aware of the communications and did not remove the lawyer from matters for which the lawyer was now conflicted,” Pippen told agency heads.

He added: “I wrote a letter to the IURC explaining the governor’s interpretation of the spirit and intention of the ethics reform he spearheaded when he came to office.”

Moreover, Daniels has directed that administrative opinions over which Storms presided will be reopened and reviewed “to ensure no undue influence was exerted in the decisions.”

It was not immediately clear which Duke cases those involved. “In short, he [Daniels] will not tolerate even the appearance of impropriety,” Pippen said in a memo to state agency heads.

Daniels also directed that a one-year cooling off period for decision makers is to be considered for those at the administrative law judge level, as well.

Further, the administration said it has referred the matter to the inspector general to determine if any laws were broken or whether misinformation was presented to the Ethics Commission.

The blowup is a potential embarrassment for the Daniels administration because  Reed was Daniels’ former commissioner of the Indiana Department of Transportation until leaving for Duke in June. Reed also was former executive director of the IURC under Daniels from 2006 to 2009.

Hardy, an attorney from Fort Wayne, was appointed to the IURC by Daniels in 2005 and was reappointed last year. His term was to have expired in 2014.

Until the mid-1980s, Hardy was an attorney for Public Service Indiana, the predecessor of North Carolina-based Duke’s operations in Indiana.

When Hardy was appointed to the commission five years ago the consumer group Citizens Action Coalition, which intervenes in utility regulation, warned that naming a former PSI lawyer was like “the chicken guarding the hen house.”

A Daniels administration spokeswoman at the time downplayed the affiliation, saying the commission needed someone who was experienced in utility industry matters.

Hardy could not be reached for comment Tuesday afternoon.

Julia Vaughn, policy director for Common Cause of Indiana, said she applauded the governor for removing Hardy, saying the situation involving Storms and Hardy appeared to be a clear violation of the state’s ethics policy.

Vaughn said she hopes the inspector general’s office can conduct a fair and far reaching investigation of the IURC, although she said it would be a difficult task for another branch of the executive branch of state government.  An independent set of eyes wouldn’t hurt, she added.

“Perhaps the U.S. attorney could launch an investigation, as well. There’s been a serious breach of the public trust,” Vaughn said.



  • But still
    It's great that these flagrant ethics violations are being punished but the scam that is the Edwardsport project is still bleeding our state dry. Indiana cannot foot the bill for the BILLIONS of dollars its going to cost for that coal plant. Firing those guys is not enough...open a hearing Edwardsport its a waste of money and lives. End it now.
  • What Has The Inspector General Ever Done?
    Maybe the Inspector General should look at many of the top Daniel's administators who are cashing in.

    Former Indiana Department of Transportation Commissioner Karl Browning has been named president of The Schneider Corp. Seems Schneider does a lot of business with the state.


    OMB Director Ryan Kitchell is now Vice President and Treasurer at Clarian Health. Seems Clarian is on a building spree backed by taxpayers and gets a tidy FSSA reimbursement kicker.


    BMV Leader Ron Stiver Moving to Clarian


    Many more if you really want to know.
  • Fatalities and Economic Incentive
    The Duke Edwardsport plant construction project has incurred five fatilities. This is totally unacceptable. Talking with the pipefitters, this project is being engineered on the fly, with a very high redo rate. This kind of engineering by the seat of your pants leads to workers being killed and extremely high costs.

    The costs of this project are being fielded by the rate payers. Duke has no economic incentive to save any money or care about poor engineering practices because the state is rubber stamping rate increases. If they pay the union $500 / hour or re-engineer the plant five times, its all the same to Duke. This is also unacceptable. Now the corruption and complete lack of controls is evident in the Utilities Commissioner, compromised lawyer and local "CEO" being out of work at least temporarily.

    We need to complete this project, but the rate payers should only have to pay the original $1.8B estimate and the construction should be shutdown pending safety and environemental reviews. Under no circumstances should we allow Duke to kill anymore Indiana workers in the name of their poor construction practices and rapacious economic approach.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ