IBJNews

Duke Energy stops insuring retirees, joining trend

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Energy Corp. is joining a growing list of corporations scrapping long-held practices of providing retirees with health insurance and giving former workers a fixed amount to buy their own supplement to Medicare coverage.

The country's largest electric company last week began notifying about 14,500 retirees of Duke Energy and predecessors or subsidiaries in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, The News & Observer of Raleigh reported Wednesday. The retirees previously worked for Duke Energy, Progress Energy, Carolina Power & Light, Cinergy, Florida Progress and others, and the changes apply to all Duke retirees except union members in Florida.

In a letter, the company told retirees it had observed double-digit annual increases in the cost of their health coverage.

"We are therefore announcing a change in the way retirees age 65 or older can purchase health coverage that we believe provides more plan options and better value," the company wrote.

Duke Energy plans to release details later, but retirees won't get the company's stipend unless they buy coverage from UnitedHealthcare for policies that take effect in January.

The move affects not only retirees ages 65 and older but also their spouses and dependents ages 65 and older who receive retirement benefits from the company or any of its predecessors or subsidiaries in six states.

The retirees will not have the option of buying subsidized coverage under the national health care overhaul law because they already get insurance through Medicare.

IBM, Time Warner, Caterpillar, General Electric, DuPont and others have made similar announcements. More companies are expected to follow the trend of offloading retirees from the company's responsibilities.

The primary benefit motivating the move is lower costs as businesses seek ways to manage runaway health care bills, said Skip Woody, a health care benefits expert at Hill, Chesson & Woody in Durham.

"The stipend can be a fixed amount, not escalating year to year," Woody said. "You can freeze the cost at what it is today."

Duke Energy is assuring retirees their options will be better as a result of the changes. Retirees currently choose from among several plans but will have more options from UnitedHealthcare, Duke spokesman Dave Scanzoni said.

The retirees' health care stipend in 2014 will be the same as the company's contribution to retiree health plans this year, Scanzoni said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Here's the Thing...
    I'm not making excuses, but the times are changing. When companies began offering health coverage to retirees, they had no idea that folks would live 25 years after retirement...Compare this to Millennials and GenXers who are switching jobs every 2-5 years. Companies are finding that their retirees are outlasting their active workers! This is where Obamacare kicks in though. Pre-existing conditions cannot be excluded from coverage with the new providers. (I hope this wasn't a conspiracy)
  • Bigger Issue
    I think the Bigger issue is how many companies, employees, and retirees are being adversely affected by the people (or persons) we elect! Obamacare Is just the tip of the iceberg we are headed into! Or, as GA Congressman, Hank Johnson, alluded some time back, we may get so out of balance, we sink!
  • Lobbying
    But Duke will continue pumping millions and millions into lobbying efforts and questionable projects, joining the trend, lol.
  • Executive Pay
    Watch the executive pay sky rocket as they magically find money from retirees' health benefit cuts.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

    2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

    3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

    4. Exciting times in Carmel.

    5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

    ADVERTISEMENT