IBJNews

Duke Energy stops insuring retirees, joining trend

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Energy Corp. is joining a growing list of corporations scrapping long-held practices of providing retirees with health insurance and giving former workers a fixed amount to buy their own supplement to Medicare coverage.

The country's largest electric company last week began notifying about 14,500 retirees of Duke Energy and predecessors or subsidiaries in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, The News & Observer of Raleigh reported Wednesday. The retirees previously worked for Duke Energy, Progress Energy, Carolina Power & Light, Cinergy, Florida Progress and others, and the changes apply to all Duke retirees except union members in Florida.

In a letter, the company told retirees it had observed double-digit annual increases in the cost of their health coverage.

"We are therefore announcing a change in the way retirees age 65 or older can purchase health coverage that we believe provides more plan options and better value," the company wrote.

Duke Energy plans to release details later, but retirees won't get the company's stipend unless they buy coverage from UnitedHealthcare for policies that take effect in January.

The move affects not only retirees ages 65 and older but also their spouses and dependents ages 65 and older who receive retirement benefits from the company or any of its predecessors or subsidiaries in six states.

The retirees will not have the option of buying subsidized coverage under the national health care overhaul law because they already get insurance through Medicare.

IBM, Time Warner, Caterpillar, General Electric, DuPont and others have made similar announcements. More companies are expected to follow the trend of offloading retirees from the company's responsibilities.

The primary benefit motivating the move is lower costs as businesses seek ways to manage runaway health care bills, said Skip Woody, a health care benefits expert at Hill, Chesson & Woody in Durham.

"The stipend can be a fixed amount, not escalating year to year," Woody said. "You can freeze the cost at what it is today."

Duke Energy is assuring retirees their options will be better as a result of the changes. Retirees currently choose from among several plans but will have more options from UnitedHealthcare, Duke spokesman Dave Scanzoni said.

The retirees' health care stipend in 2014 will be the same as the company's contribution to retiree health plans this year, Scanzoni said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Here's the Thing...
    I'm not making excuses, but the times are changing. When companies began offering health coverage to retirees, they had no idea that folks would live 25 years after retirement...Compare this to Millennials and GenXers who are switching jobs every 2-5 years. Companies are finding that their retirees are outlasting their active workers! This is where Obamacare kicks in though. Pre-existing conditions cannot be excluded from coverage with the new providers. (I hope this wasn't a conspiracy)
  • Bigger Issue
    I think the Bigger issue is how many companies, employees, and retirees are being adversely affected by the people (or persons) we elect! Obamacare Is just the tip of the iceberg we are headed into! Or, as GA Congressman, Hank Johnson, alluded some time back, we may get so out of balance, we sink!
  • Lobbying
    But Duke will continue pumping millions and millions into lobbying efforts and questionable projects, joining the trend, lol.
  • Executive Pay
    Watch the executive pay sky rocket as they magically find money from retirees' health benefit cuts.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT