IBJNews

Duke loss narrows, quarter meets expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Duke Realty Corp. on Wednesday reported a third-quarter loss of $28.2 million, or 11 cents per share, smaller than a loss of $32 million, or 13 cents per share, in the same quarter of 2011.

Funds from operations, or FFO, for the quarter hit $69.9 million, or 26 cents per share, which was in line with analyst expectations. That compared with $70.3 million, or 28 cents per share, in the year-ago quarter. FFO is a common measure of performance for real estate investment trusts.

Total revenue declined to $302.9 million in the third quarter from $312.3 million a year earlier.

Duke said it completed leasing of 7.4 million square feet of space, and its portfolio had an occupancy rate of 92.5 percent. Highlights during the quarter include the acquisition of a $342 million medical office portfolio; the company also launched $115 million of new developments.

On the financing side, Duke issued $300 million of 10-year, senior unsecured notes, with an effective rate of 3.93 percent, and issued about 5.8 million new shares of common stock for proceeds of $85 million.

Duke shares fell about 20 cents in early trading Thursday, to $14.29 each.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT