IBJNews

Duke poised to buy South Florida portfolio

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Locally based Duke Realty Corp. is poised to buy a $500 million portfolio of industrial and office properties located primarily in South Florida from Premier Commercial Realty, according to a report in the South Florida Business Journal.

The purchase would continue Duke’s recent push into the South Florida industrial market. It bought its first two South Florida bulk industrial buildings from Pompano Beach-based Premier in June as part of the $20 million purchase of the 27-acre Premier Turnpike Park. By late October, Duke had leased one of the 112,000-square-foot buildings to the General Services Administration.

Duke officials didn’t return calls seeking comment on the pending purchase of the much larger Premier portfolio, which comprises about 6.5 million square feet of space. The sale is expected to close by the end of the year.

Duke’s previous purchase of property from Premier isn’t the only connection between the companies. Ed Mitchell, Duke’s senior vice president in South Florida, was formerly president of Premier.

Duke has been on a buying spree this year compared to the depths of the recession in 2009. Through the first three quarters of 2010, Duke spent $324 million on income-producing properties and developable land. It spent $17 million in the same period last year.

The company reported operating income of $155.3 million for the first three quarters of the year, compared with a loss of $143.5 million in the same period last year.

Its stock closed Monday at $11.33, down 8 cents on the day. Shares have traded as low as $10.19 and as high as $14.35 over the past year.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Just because someone supports the project, they are a PR shill for the developer? Myself and everyone I know has no connection whatsoever to any developer. We just want Broad Ripple to move forward and develop, not stay stagnant.

  2. And the failure on the part of Indiana GOP to allow an expansion of Medicaid had nothing to do with Indiana hospitals' financial woes?

  3. It would have been nice if they could have arranged for at least some of Zaxby's menu to be sold at the concession stands as part of the marketing campaign.

  4. Get the feeling Browning has some PR presence on the message board this morning. I don't know a single person in the neighborhood who supports this project.

  5. Grew up in Warfleigh, which is the neighborhood directly across College from the proposed development. I am against the proposed project for several reasons: 1) Traffic Flow -- College is already a mess, especially with the new lane guidance which makes the southbound left lane 'turn only' at Broad Ripple Ave. Not to mention the backups at 64th and College. If this is in fact a Whole Foods, I would expect a steady stream of cars pulling in and out, either off College or 64th Street which are both bad already. 2) Use of TIF funds. I though TIF funds were for under-developed areas, to help bolster property tax rolls for the city. I agree with Barth that this area will do just fine letting market forces dictate what is developed. 3) Specialty Grocer Overkill. There is already a Fresh Market a mile south and a Whole Foods 2 miles north. This store is not needed. Frankly I shocked that the Whole Foods site selection criteria supports a store right here 4) Hurts the Character of the Neighborhood. This type of development, along with the (hideous) parking garage down the street are out of character with the history and fabric of this area. Broad Ripple has succeeded because it was quirky and different. It would be a shame if the city gets involved and helps support ANOTHER project that aims to turn Broad Ripple into some kind of manufactured urban center.

ADVERTISEMENT