IBJNews

Durham enlisted directors with personal, financial ties

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Greg Andrews

Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi never seemed like an ideal fit to serve as a board member of a finance company.

“Math was never my strongest subject in school,” Brizzi said hours before FBI agents on Nov. 24 executed search warrants and seized records related to Ohio-based Fair Finance Co., a business led and co-owned by his pal, Tim Durham.

Durham

Brizzi, who said he accepted the Fair directorship in October because he wanted to learn more about finance, quit several weeks later, after learning IBJ was working on a story raising questions about its business practices.

But his short stint reflects a larger pattern in Durham’s business dealings. He’s filled board slots with friends and associates—not with truly independent businesspeople likely to stand in his way.

At least two other men who have served or are serving as ostensibly independent directors at Fair, for instance, have deep personal or financial ties to Durham.

And another company where Durham is a major investor and director, Dallas-based CLST Holdings Inc., this year brought aboard a longtime Durham associate after prior director Manoj Rajegowda quit to protest a controversial transaction.

In the deal, CLST, which was in the process of winding down after selling its cell-phone distribution operations, purchased consumer-finance receivables from Fair, providing the Ohio company badly needed cash.

A New York investment firm, Red Oak Partners, this year launched a proxy fight in hopes of winning CLST board seats on the grounds that insiders have “knowingly or recklessly violated their fiduciary duties.”

Red Oak has balked at several CLST moves, including the appointment of Rajegowda’s successor, David Tornek, a partner with Durham in Touch, a restaurant in Miami Beach, Fla. In a Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Red Oak says it does not believe Tornek will provide “objective, unbiased scrutiny,” given that he “has done business with Tim Durham for years, knows him personally and has been featured in news articles with him.”

Similar ties abound at Fair. Brizzi’s director slot previously was held by Dan Laikin, another Durham friend. The pair was part of a local group that nearly a decade ago teamed up to acquire control of National Lampoon Inc.

Durham stepped in as CEO of the Los Angeles company a year ago, after a grand jury indicted then-CEO Laikin on stock-manipulation charges. Laikin pleaded guilty to one felony count in September and is awaiting sentencing.

Laikin also was an investor and board member at Obsidian Enterprises Inc., Durham’s Indianapolis-based leveraged-buyout firm. Obsidian was one of the largest recipients of the related-party loans that have cast uncertainty over the viability of Fair, and Laikin himself borrowed millions from the company. Securities filings show he pledged his $10 million Malibu, Calif., home as collateral.

So it’s hard to think of Laikin as a watchdog. But that’s the role he was supposed to fill on the Fair board. Securities registrations listed him as an independent director charged with approving loans in which Durham and other company principals had a financial interest.

In all, related-party loans now exceed $168 million—by far the largest asset on Fair’s balance sheet. Repaying Fair’s investors, everyday Ohioans who purchased short-term investment certificates, hinges on insiders’ making good on their debts. Fair owes purchasers of investment certificates more than $200 million.

Investigators are swarming. In court documents, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Indianapolis alleged Fair operated as a Ponzi scheme, using money from new investors to pay what it owed prior investors, thereby “lulling the earlier victims into believing that their money was being [handled] responsibly.” The SEC also is investigating and has subpoenaed a mountain of documents from CLST, including the deal that spurred Rajegdowda’s resignation.

With Brizzi out of the picture, Durham has turned to another old friend to help carry Fair through its difficult times. Filings with securities regulators show the new director is Scott McKain, a former WISH-TV Channel 8 reporter who now is a professional speaker and principal of the Value Added Institute, a think tank focused on building client loyalty.

But that’s not all. McKain, who could not be reached, also serves as vice chairman of Obsidian Enterprises. And he is forever grateful to Durham for providing money to help him and his wife deal with the financial devastation wrought by her battle with ovarian cancer.

“Had it not been for the support and generosity of my best friend, Tim Durham, I don’t know how we could have made it,” McKain wrote on his blog. “We lost all we had—but without Tim we would have been bankrupt and wondering where the next meal … was coming from.”•

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT