
Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi never seemed like an ideal fit to serve as a board member of a finance company.
“Math was never my strongest subject in school,” Brizzi said hours before FBI agents on Nov. 24 executed
search warrants and seized records related to Ohio-based Fair Finance Co., a business led and co-owned by his pal, Tim Durham.
DurhamBrizzi, who said he accepted the Fair directorship in October because he wanted to learn more about finance, quit several
weeks later, after learning IBJ was working on a story raising questions about its business practices.
But his short stint reflects a larger pattern in Durham’s business dealings. He’s filled board slots with friends
and associates—not with truly independent businesspeople likely to stand in his way.
At least two other
men who have served or are serving as ostensibly independent directors at Fair, for instance, have deep personal or financial
ties to Durham.
And another company where Durham is a major investor and director,
Dallas-based CLST Holdings Inc., this year brought aboard a longtime Durham associate after prior director Manoj Rajegowda
quit to protest a controversial transaction.
In the deal, CLST, which was in the process of winding down after
selling its cell-phone distribution operations, purchased consumer-finance receivables from Fair, providing the Ohio company
badly needed cash.
A New York investment firm, Red Oak Partners, this year launched a proxy fight in hopes of
winning CLST board seats on the grounds that insiders have “knowingly or recklessly violated their fiduciary duties.”
Red Oak has balked at several CLST moves, including the appointment of Rajegowda’s successor, David Tornek,
a partner with Durham in Touch, a restaurant in Miami Beach, Fla. In a Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Red Oak
says it does not believe Tornek will provide “objective, unbiased scrutiny,” given that he “has done business
with Tim Durham for years, knows him personally and has been featured in news articles with him.”
Similar
ties abound at Fair. Brizzi’s director slot previously was held by Dan Laikin, another Durham friend. The pair was part
of a local group that nearly a decade ago teamed up to acquire control of National Lampoon Inc.
Durham stepped
in as CEO of the Los Angeles company a year ago, after a grand jury indicted then-CEO Laikin on stock-manipulation charges.
Laikin pleaded guilty to one felony count in September and is awaiting sentencing.
Laikin also was an investor
and board member at Obsidian Enterprises Inc., Durham’s Indianapolis-based leveraged-buyout firm. Obsidian was one of
the largest recipients of the related-party loans that have cast uncertainty over the viability of Fair, and Laikin himself
borrowed millions from the company. Securities filings show he pledged his $10 million Malibu, Calif., home as collateral.
So it’s hard to think of Laikin as a watchdog. But that’s the role he was supposed to fill on the Fair
board. Securities registrations listed him as an independent director charged with approving loans in which Durham and other
company principals had a financial interest.
In all, related-party loans now exceed $168 million—by far
the largest asset on Fair’s balance sheet. Repaying Fair’s investors, everyday Ohioans who purchased short-term
investment certificates, hinges on insiders’ making good on their debts. Fair owes purchasers of investment certificates
more than $200 million.
Investigators are swarming. In court documents, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Indianapolis
alleged Fair operated as a Ponzi scheme, using money from new investors to pay what it owed prior investors, thereby “lulling
the earlier victims into believing that their money was being [handled] responsibly.” The SEC also is investigating
and has subpoenaed a mountain of documents from CLST, including the deal that spurred Rajegdowda’s resignation.
With Brizzi out of the picture, Durham has turned to another old friend to help carry Fair through its difficult times.
Filings with securities regulators show the new director is Scott McKain, a former WISH-TV Channel 8 reporter who now is a
professional speaker and principal of the Value Added Institute, a think tank focused on building client loyalty.
But that’s not all. McKain, who could not be reached, also serves as vice chairman of Obsidian Enterprises. And he
is forever grateful to Durham for providing money to help him and his wife deal with the financial devastation wrought by
her battle with ovarian cancer.
“Had it not been for the support and generosity of my best friend, Tim
Durham, I don’t know how we could have made it,” McKain wrote on his blog. “We lost all we had—but
without Tim we would have been bankrupt and wondering where the next meal … was coming from.”•

















Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.
Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!
Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.
As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.
Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.