IBJNews

Economist: Recovery at hand, but barriers exist

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Leading indicators show that an economic recovery likely will take hold in 2010, although several challenges remain that could delay a solid rebound from the worst recession in a generation, an economist said Friday morning at IBJ’s annual Economic Forecast.

“These set of indicators have a pretty good history of not only calling recessions but also recoveries,” John Augustine, chief investment strategist at Cincinnati-based Fifth Third Bank, told an audience at the downtown Westin hotel. "And they’re calling a recovery now.” (See video interview of Augustine below.)

Stronger corporate profits, higher stock-market returns and growth in the nation’s gross domestic product are telling indicators that the country is on the cusp of a recovery, Augustine said.

The major stock indexes are up by double digits so far this year and investors are raising their expectations for corporate earnings. The third-quarter earnings season began Oct. 7, and investors will learn from company announcements during the next few weeks whether the economy truly is in the recovery stages.

In fact, corporate profits on average are expected to grow 20 percent next year, much better than the 7-percent norm. The U.S. GDP is expected to climb as well—2.4 percent in 2010, from an anticipated dip of 2.6 percent this year.

“We’re transitioning from extreme negative numbers to positive numbers,” Augustine said.

Yet, potential barriers exist. Among the biggest concerns are whether foreign countries will finance new debt and whether the enormous amount of stimulus funding from the federal government will lead to inflation.



China, Japan and the Middle East are the largest financiers of U.S. debt. Augustine expects the foreign support to continue, at least in the short term, because those countries need American consumers to start buying their goods again.

U.S. debt in 2009 is expected to account for 78 percent of the country’s GDP, tying it with India for the 14th highest percentage worldwide.

The federal government still has yet to release $600 billion in stimulus funds, which could further add to the deficit. Many economists fear the release of so much money into the economy might cause inflation. Some have even predicted inflation might shoot to 10 percent from near deflation now.

“You get so much money thrown at the economy that you get too much money chasing too few goods,” Augustine said.
 
In addition, consumer spending, which accounts for 70 percent of the nation’s GDP, is likely to increase slowly as consumers start saving more. Consumer spending already is at its weakest since WWII.

Trends Augustine foresees relating to the business community include slow rehiring, simplified business models, an emphasis on finding new growth markets worldwide and less leverage.

Any recovery could be slowed by the the federal government’s growing role in the private sector, he said. It already owns 60 percent of General Motors Corp., 34 percent of Citigroup, 10 percent of Chrysler, and is the world’s largest insurer, due to its ownership stake in American International Group Inc.

If the government’s involvement continues for too long, Augustine warned, the United States will begin to resemble Europe—where 1-percent economic growth, 9- percent unemployment and much less business formation is the norm.

This recovery, Augustine said, “is going to be about Washington.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT