IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Interstate network isn't enough

 IBJ Staff
May 14, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Indiana’s interstate highway network is something to behold. Interstates 70, 74 and 65 crisscross the state. Interstate 69 will join them once it’s extended from here to Evansville. And when the Hoosier Heartland Highway Corridor is finished between Fort Wayne and Lafayette and U.S. 31 is upgraded to interstate standards from here to South Bend, you won’t be able to go far in Indiana without going over, under or onto an interstate highway.

Perhaps the fact we’re so thoroughly outfitted with roads explains the reluctance of Hoosier lawmakers and transportation planners to get serious about alternative modes of transportation. But get serious they must. Our country’s transportation future is too uncertain for Hoosiers to be almost entirely car-dependent.

That didn’t stop some legislators from trying to take us backward in the session just ended. Public transit advocates had to fight off an effort to sharply reduce transit funding in the new state budget. Advocates ultimately preserved funding at around $42 million a year, but legislators did away with the formula that’s been used to fill the coffers of the Public Mass Transit Fund, which distributes money to IndyGo and other transit providers around the state. Instead, the budget calls for a lump-sum payment to the fund, leaving transit advocates to wonder if they’ll be starting from scratch when it comes time to write the next state budget.

They’re also left to wonder what meaning to attach to two transportation studies that were approved by the Legislature.

Lawmakers who wanted to reduce funding for transit instead won authorization to have the Commission on State Tax and Finance Policy study this summer what role the state should play in public transit funding. Is the suggestion that perhaps the state should play no role?

Another measure, House Bill 1371, creates the Joint Study Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Assessments and Solutions to spend two years taking a comprehensive look at the state’s transportation infrastructure and funding needs through 2035.

An optimist might view that study as an opportunity for the state to set a course for a more well-rounded transportation policy. But we wonder if the two-year duration of the study will be cited to derail the push next year for more transit funding.

IndyConnect, the coalition seeking to diversify transportation options in Indianapolis, is expected to ask the 2012 Legislature to authorize referenda in which local governments could ask voters to sign off on a dedicated, ongoing source of funds, such as a percentage of sales or income tax revenue.

If legislators will listen to the IndyConnect folks with an open mind, it could signal the beginning of a more well-rounded transportation system for the state—one that doesn’t rely entirely on our network of interstates, impressive as they are.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT