IBJNews

Elevator company wants indemnity from IRT

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Illinois elevator company wants a judge to force the Indiana Repertory Theatre to protect it from liability in a lawsuit brought by a catering worker who fell down the elevator shaft at the downtown theater in 2007.

Charlie Stamps of Indianapolis sued IRT and Kone Elevators for negligence after he fell four stories. Stamps, who worked for MBP Distinctive Catering, was operating a hot cart near the elevator doors on Dec. 14, 2007, according to his November 2009 lawsuit in Marion County. When he reached down for the electrical cord, the elevator doors opened, and he fell down the shaft to the basement.

Kone, a Finnish company with its U.S. operations based in Moline, Ill., claims in a federal lawsuit filed this month that its maintenance agreement with the IRT requires it to indemnify the elevator company. Kone says a second agreement requires IRT to name Kone on its insurance policy for commercial bodily injury and property damage liability.

The company wants the judge to declare the not-for-profit IRT's obligations and pay Kone's costs in both lawsuits.

Stamps' lawsuit doesn't request a specific amount of damages, but Kone thinks the figure could be high. Kone's attorneys cited a deposition in which Stamps said he spent several weeks in the hospital with surgery to his wrist and knee, and that he expects more surgery.

A representative of the IRT could not be reached Thursday morning.

So far IRT has rebuffed Kone's requests for indemnity. Lewis Wagner insurance lawyer Richard Shoultz sent Kone's attorneys a letter last August explaining that the company was relying on an inaccurate version of the agreement, and that the company had not responded to IRT's concerns.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT