IBJNews

Elevator company wants indemnity from IRT

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

An Illinois elevator company wants a judge to force the Indiana Repertory Theatre to protect it from liability in a lawsuit brought by a catering worker who fell down the elevator shaft at the downtown theater in 2007.

Charlie Stamps of Indianapolis sued IRT and Kone Elevators for negligence after he fell four stories. Stamps, who worked for MBP Distinctive Catering, was operating a hot cart near the elevator doors on Dec. 14, 2007, according to his November 2009 lawsuit in Marion County. When he reached down for the electrical cord, the elevator doors opened, and he fell down the shaft to the basement.

Kone, a Finnish company with its U.S. operations based in Moline, Ill., claims in a federal lawsuit filed this month that its maintenance agreement with the IRT requires it to indemnify the elevator company. Kone says a second agreement requires IRT to name Kone on its insurance policy for commercial bodily injury and property damage liability.

The company wants the judge to declare the not-for-profit IRT's obligations and pay Kone's costs in both lawsuits.

Stamps' lawsuit doesn't request a specific amount of damages, but Kone thinks the figure could be high. Kone's attorneys cited a deposition in which Stamps said he spent several weeks in the hospital with surgery to his wrist and knee, and that he expects more surgery.

A representative of the IRT could not be reached Thursday morning.

So far IRT has rebuffed Kone's requests for indemnity. Lewis Wagner insurance lawyer Richard Shoultz sent Kone's attorneys a letter last August explaining that the company was relying on an inaccurate version of the agreement, and that the company had not responded to IRT's concerns.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, let me say that I love the idea of communities being self-sufficient and people in the community not needing cars, living, working and shopping all in their neighborhood. To sum it up; I love good urban planning and hate urban sprawl. However, there are two reasons that I am against this development. First, this building doesn't fit. Density can occur in Ripple by building up top the street and better use of land. The scale of this project should be downtown. Secondly, I would be willing to bet that if a whole foods in Ripple is built, the Nora store would be closed. Here's my reasoning. The Nora Whole Foods expansion plans have been put on hold. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the Ripple proposal. Communities next to each other should work together to end sprawl and not work against each other and take other neighbors assets. Develop something both communities can be proud of and will attract more development and density. There's my soap box for the day.

  2. My apologies, Lou - it was the Indy Star that printed cost for entertaining "celebrities" during Indy 500. Sorry for confusing the always timely IBJ with Indy's Gannett reprint news source.

  3. That's fine if you want a grocery store that has festivals and live music. I guess with the prices they charge, they can afford to host such activities. As for me, I choose to spend my money more wisely and if I want to go to a festival or a concert, I will pay for that separately - not through my grocery bill.

  4. TIF is not just to attract development but to attract a higher use for that development. Carmel wisely is using TIF for numerous public parking garages. Asphalt seas of parking pay little taxes and bring even less value to a commercial area. Also density is what is going to save Indy and Broad Ripple. The days of trying to compete with burbs are long gone.

  5. The Prestige was an awesome movie.

ADVERTISEMENT