IBJNews

Emmis asks judge to rule on legality of stock plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

In a pre-emptive move, Emmis Communications Corp. is asking a Marion Superior Court judge to declare legal its plan to strip preferred shareholders of their right to collect millions of dollars in dividends.

The Indianapolis media company filed a lawsuit on Friday that would prevent preferred shareholders unhappy with the plan from challenging its validity in court later, if the judge rules in favor of Emmis.

A judgment could come soon, as company shareholders are set to vote on the plan at an April 2 special meeting.

“Unless resolved, the controversy could create uncertainty, and cause potentially irreparable harm to Emmis and/or the holders of the common stock,” Emmis wrote in its suit.
 
If successful, the tactic might cause Emmis’ long-slumping common stock to spring higher. Company shares were trading for a mere 86 cents each Monday morning, weighed down by massive liabilities stemming from the company’s issuance of $140 million in preferred stock 13 years ago.

The move is the latest step in Emmis’ quest to free itself from the burdensome requirements of the preferred stock. The shares are supposed to pay 6.25 percent, but the financially strapped company has been exercising its right to suspend payments since October 2008. From then through early December 2011, $26.7 million in unpaid dividends piled up as liabilities on Emmis’ balance sheet.

In addition to being asked to weaken the rights of preferred shareholders, investors at the meeting will consider authorizing a reverse stock split that would push the price of the company’s shares above $1 each. NASDAQ has been threatening to delist the shares because they have closed below the $1 threshold since July.

Since the announcement of the plan early this month to conduct the split, Emmis shares have slowly risen from a price of 68 cents each.

The changes to be voted on at the special meeting in April require two-thirds approval of the preferred shareholders.

Listed as defendants in Emmis’ lawsuit are preferred shareholders Zazove Associates LLC in Nevada, Corre Opportunities Fund LP in New York, DJD Group LLLP in Florida, Kevan A. Fight of Ohio, and First Derivative Traders LLP in Pennsylvania.

Together, they own more than 811,000 shares of preferred stock.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, let me say that I love the idea of communities being self-sufficient and people in the community not needing cars, living, working and shopping all in their neighborhood. To sum it up; I love good urban planning and hate urban sprawl. However, there are two reasons that I am against this development. First, this building doesn't fit. Density can occur in Ripple by building up top the street and better use of land. The scale of this project should be downtown. Secondly, I would be willing to bet that if a whole foods in Ripple is built, the Nora store would be closed. Here's my reasoning. The Nora Whole Foods expansion plans have been put on hold. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the Ripple proposal. Communities next to each other should work together to end sprawl and not work against each other and take other neighbors assets. Develop something both communities can be proud of and will attract more development and density. There's my soap box for the day.

  2. My apologies, Lou - it was the Indy Star that printed cost for entertaining "celebrities" during Indy 500. Sorry for confusing the always timely IBJ with Indy's Gannett reprint news source.

  3. That's fine if you want a grocery store that has festivals and live music. I guess with the prices they charge, they can afford to host such activities. As for me, I choose to spend my money more wisely and if I want to go to a festival or a concert, I will pay for that separately - not through my grocery bill.

  4. TIF is not just to attract development but to attract a higher use for that development. Carmel wisely is using TIF for numerous public parking garages. Asphalt seas of parking pay little taxes and bring even less value to a commercial area. Also density is what is going to save Indy and Broad Ripple. The days of trying to compete with burbs are long gone.

  5. The Prestige was an awesome movie.

ADVERTISEMENT