IBJNews

Emmis asks judge to rule on legality of stock plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

In a pre-emptive move, Emmis Communications Corp. is asking a Marion Superior Court judge to declare legal its plan to strip preferred shareholders of their right to collect millions of dollars in dividends.

The Indianapolis media company filed a lawsuit on Friday that would prevent preferred shareholders unhappy with the plan from challenging its validity in court later, if the judge rules in favor of Emmis.

A judgment could come soon, as company shareholders are set to vote on the plan at an April 2 special meeting.

“Unless resolved, the controversy could create uncertainty, and cause potentially irreparable harm to Emmis and/or the holders of the common stock,” Emmis wrote in its suit.
 
If successful, the tactic might cause Emmis’ long-slumping common stock to spring higher. Company shares were trading for a mere 86 cents each Monday morning, weighed down by massive liabilities stemming from the company’s issuance of $140 million in preferred stock 13 years ago.

The move is the latest step in Emmis’ quest to free itself from the burdensome requirements of the preferred stock. The shares are supposed to pay 6.25 percent, but the financially strapped company has been exercising its right to suspend payments since October 2008. From then through early December 2011, $26.7 million in unpaid dividends piled up as liabilities on Emmis’ balance sheet.

In addition to being asked to weaken the rights of preferred shareholders, investors at the meeting will consider authorizing a reverse stock split that would push the price of the company’s shares above $1 each. NASDAQ has been threatening to delist the shares because they have closed below the $1 threshold since July.

Since the announcement of the plan early this month to conduct the split, Emmis shares have slowly risen from a price of 68 cents each.

The changes to be voted on at the special meeting in April require two-thirds approval of the preferred shareholders.

Listed as defendants in Emmis’ lawsuit are preferred shareholders Zazove Associates LLC in Nevada, Corre Opportunities Fund LP in New York, DJD Group LLLP in Florida, Kevan A. Fight of Ohio, and First Derivative Traders LLP in Pennsylvania.

Together, they own more than 811,000 shares of preferred stock.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT