IBJNews

Emmis asks judge to rule on legality of stock plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In a pre-emptive move, Emmis Communications Corp. is asking a Marion Superior Court judge to declare legal its plan to strip preferred shareholders of their right to collect millions of dollars in dividends.

The Indianapolis media company filed a lawsuit on Friday that would prevent preferred shareholders unhappy with the plan from challenging its validity in court later, if the judge rules in favor of Emmis.

A judgment could come soon, as company shareholders are set to vote on the plan at an April 2 special meeting.

“Unless resolved, the controversy could create uncertainty, and cause potentially irreparable harm to Emmis and/or the holders of the common stock,” Emmis wrote in its suit.
 
If successful, the tactic might cause Emmis’ long-slumping common stock to spring higher. Company shares were trading for a mere 86 cents each Monday morning, weighed down by massive liabilities stemming from the company’s issuance of $140 million in preferred stock 13 years ago.

The move is the latest step in Emmis’ quest to free itself from the burdensome requirements of the preferred stock. The shares are supposed to pay 6.25 percent, but the financially strapped company has been exercising its right to suspend payments since October 2008. From then through early December 2011, $26.7 million in unpaid dividends piled up as liabilities on Emmis’ balance sheet.

In addition to being asked to weaken the rights of preferred shareholders, investors at the meeting will consider authorizing a reverse stock split that would push the price of the company’s shares above $1 each. NASDAQ has been threatening to delist the shares because they have closed below the $1 threshold since July.

Since the announcement of the plan early this month to conduct the split, Emmis shares have slowly risen from a price of 68 cents each.

The changes to be voted on at the special meeting in April require two-thirds approval of the preferred shareholders.

Listed as defendants in Emmis’ lawsuit are preferred shareholders Zazove Associates LLC in Nevada, Corre Opportunities Fund LP in New York, DJD Group LLLP in Florida, Kevan A. Fight of Ohio, and First Derivative Traders LLP in Pennsylvania.

Together, they own more than 811,000 shares of preferred stock.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.

ADVERTISEMENT