IBJNews

Emmis asks judge to rule on legality of stock plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In a pre-emptive move, Emmis Communications Corp. is asking a Marion Superior Court judge to declare legal its plan to strip preferred shareholders of their right to collect millions of dollars in dividends.

The Indianapolis media company filed a lawsuit on Friday that would prevent preferred shareholders unhappy with the plan from challenging its validity in court later, if the judge rules in favor of Emmis.

A judgment could come soon, as company shareholders are set to vote on the plan at an April 2 special meeting.

“Unless resolved, the controversy could create uncertainty, and cause potentially irreparable harm to Emmis and/or the holders of the common stock,” Emmis wrote in its suit.
 
If successful, the tactic might cause Emmis’ long-slumping common stock to spring higher. Company shares were trading for a mere 86 cents each Monday morning, weighed down by massive liabilities stemming from the company’s issuance of $140 million in preferred stock 13 years ago.

The move is the latest step in Emmis’ quest to free itself from the burdensome requirements of the preferred stock. The shares are supposed to pay 6.25 percent, but the financially strapped company has been exercising its right to suspend payments since October 2008. From then through early December 2011, $26.7 million in unpaid dividends piled up as liabilities on Emmis’ balance sheet.

In addition to being asked to weaken the rights of preferred shareholders, investors at the meeting will consider authorizing a reverse stock split that would push the price of the company’s shares above $1 each. NASDAQ has been threatening to delist the shares because they have closed below the $1 threshold since July.

Since the announcement of the plan early this month to conduct the split, Emmis shares have slowly risen from a price of 68 cents each.

The changes to be voted on at the special meeting in April require two-thirds approval of the preferred shareholders.

Listed as defendants in Emmis’ lawsuit are preferred shareholders Zazove Associates LLC in Nevada, Corre Opportunities Fund LP in New York, DJD Group LLLP in Florida, Kevan A. Fight of Ohio, and First Derivative Traders LLP in Pennsylvania.

Together, they own more than 811,000 shares of preferred stock.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT