IBJNews

Emmis on way to avoiding stock delisting

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based media company Emmis Communications Corp. is halfway home to maintaining its listing on the NASDAQ stock exchange.

NASDAQ notified Emmis in September that it would be delisted from the exchange if the company’s stock didn’t rise above the minimum bid price of $1 per share for 10 straight business days before March 15.

Emmis shares closed Monday at $1.50, marking five straight days in which its stock price has exceeded the $1 benchmark.

Emmis’ string of closings above $1 began on Oct. 13, when shares ended the day at $1.15. Shares hadn't traded for more than $1 in more than a year.  The stock price rose to $1.32 last Wednesday and was relatively unchanged the next day before rising to $1.46 on Friday. Shares climbed to $1.50 on Monday, marking their highest closing since September 2008.

Wells Fargo analyst Marci Ryvicker, who follows Emmis, wrote in a report earlier this month that September revenue, which will be reported in the company’s fiscal third-quarter results, was better than August's. And so far, October seems to be looking healthier than September, she said.

The news is having a positive impact on Emmis stock, she said.

“Comments from Emmis management confirm what we have been hearing from other large and small market groups—trends continue to improve month to month,” Ryvicker wrote.

She is forecasting a 2-percent decline in industry-wide radio revenue in 2010, but that's much improved from the industry’s recent performance.

In its fiscal second quarter ended Aug. 31, Emmis suffered a whopping loss of $135.6 million. Much of the loss was attributed to a $160.9 million impairment charge the company took related to the declining value of its Federal Communications Commission radio licenses. The company earned $1.2 million in the same quarter a year earlier.

Emmis' quarterly revenue of $68 million in the second quarter was down 27 percent, from $93.7 million in the same period a year ago.

Patrick Walsh, Emmis’ chief operating officer and chief financial officer, told IBJ following the delisting threat that he thought the stock was showing signs of life after bottoming out in July at 24 cents.

“We’re actually hopeful through our own operating performance that our stock will continue to rise, and the situation will remedy itself,” he said last month.

Emmis and many other broadcasters have been weighed down by heavy debt, falling advertising revenue and the perception that radio is a bygone medium.

But several radio companies posted double-digit percentage gains in their stock prices through the first two quarters of the year. Broadcasters are hoping to get an additional boost from the installation of FM receivers in Apple iPods.

NASDAQ suspended its minimum-stock-price requirement rule last fall after financial markets tanked, but reinstated the rule Aug. 3

Should Emmis fail to meet NASDAQ’s 10-day demand, its stock would be relegated to penny-stock status on the over-the-counter bulletin board or the pink sheets. Once that happens, shares are harder to buy and sell, because by then a company has less liquidity, said Tom Gjerde, an economics and finance professor at Butler University’s College of Business.

“The biggest thing is that [a delisting] has a negative psychological effect on investors,” he said. “It doesn’t really motivate you to purchase the stock.”

Emmis could appeal any decision to delist its shares, the company said.

Emmis operates local radio stations WIBC-FM 93.1, WLHK-FM 97.1, WYXB-FM 105.7 and WFNI-AM 1070.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT