IBJNews

Employer health coverage on 10-year fall, study says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The share of Americans who get health benefits through work dropped to 60 percent in 2011, continuing a decade-long slide that highlights the challenges facing President Barack Obama’s insurance overhaul.

U.S. employers provided coverage for 159 million people in 2011, 12 million fewer than in 2000, according to a study released Thursday by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The report blamed the decline on the total number of jobs available as well as insurance premiums that have more than doubled in some cases.

Michigan, Indiana and South Carolina saw the steepest declines in employer-backed coverage, at about 15 percentage points each.

Alaska, Massachusetts and North Dakota were the only states with stable rates, the report found. No state saw an increase.

“Everyone’s costs have increased dramatically,” Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, president of the Princeton, N.J.-based foundation, said in a prepared statement. “Higher costs naturally translate into fewer employers offering insurance coverage, and fewer employees accepting it, even when it is offered.”

Obama’s Affordable Care Act, passed in 2010, is expected to boost coverage in the U.S. by 27 million people this decade, according to congressional projections, even as employer- sponsored insurance continues to shrink. The law penalizes businesses that don’t offer affordable insurance and offers subsidies for small employers. It also imposes taxes and regulations that may increase the cost for some.

So far, the legislation’s main effect has been to increase coverage for young adults, said Julie Sonier, a University of Minnesota researcher who helped prepare the report. The act allows children to stay on a parents’ health plan to age 26.

Beyond that, it’s too early to measure the law’s impact on employers, Sonier said in a phone interview from Minneapolis. Most of its major provisions don’t take effect until next year, she said, including a mandate that all Americans obtain coverage or pay a penalty.

Nationally, the share of private-sector employers offering coverage fell to about 52 percent in 2011 from 59 percent in 2000, according to the study.

Insurance costs increased during the time period, with the average premium for a single employee doubling to $5,081. The average family premium rose 125 percent, to $14,447, the report found.

Employee take-up of benefits dropped over the study period as well, to 76 percent from 82 percent, researchers said.

Insurance rates varied widely from state to state, according to the report.

The report is based on data from the U.S. Census and other surveys and sponsored by the foundation, a research and advocacy group that promotes health coverage.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Elaine
    Obamacare has nothing to do with what you paid last year. Your numbers make no sense. Basing it on the average, your premiums should be around $1,500 a year; that means you make $15,000 a year? Are you sure your employer pays 90%?? Sounds like you should be applauding Health Care Reform, it will most likely help you when it really starts to kick in next year.
  • Obamacare is an Abomination
    More than 10% of my salary went to pay for employer sponsored health care premiums last year (and my employer pays 90% of the employee portion!) and I still have a $5000 deductible. This was and is a killing plan to small businesses.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

    2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

    3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

    4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

    5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

    ADVERTISEMENT