Employers mull legal challenge to new state gun law

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The state’s top business advocate said he would support a challenge to a new state law that took effect Thursday allowing workers to keep guns out of sight in their locked vehicles while parked on their employers’ property.

At least a dozen members of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce are interested in potentially pursuing a legal challenge, though no specific plans of action exist, Chamber President Kevin Brinegar said.

Brinegar, an outspoken critic of the new law, said his organization would not lead any legal challenge but instead would defer to its members.

“The question is whether employers can prohibit employees from bringing guns on their property,” he said. “Many employers feel very strongly that this is their right and should remain their right.”

One of those is steel producer ArcelorMittal USA in northwest Indiana.

The company sent a memo to workers at its mills in East Chicago and Burns Harbor telling them officials would strictly enforce its firearms ban because federal law supercedes the state law, according to The Times of Northwest Indiana.

Ice Miller LLP labor lawyer Paul Sinclair predicted businesses will force the General Assembly to justify why some are companies are exempt from the new guns-at-work law and others are not.

Schools and day cares are exempt. So are pharmaceutical companies and refineries.

“The question is, why is it that we carve out some employers and say they’re protected from all of this, but not other employers?” Sinclair said.

Several business groups concerned about workplace violence opposed the measure as the Legislature was weighing the measure earlier this year.

For more, go to IBJ blog NewsTalk.


  • @CK
    With respect, please don't pigeonhole law-abiding citizens as demonic mass-murderers. This law was passed to regain previously lost ground on Constitutionally provided rights.

    What's more, any one of the shootings that instilled your (sensational, albeit understandable) fear of an active shooter could* have been proactively ended, de-escalated, or even completely avoided, had employees been allowed to securely stow a means to defend themselves.

    For one, assailants in those situations are only so brazen in gun-free zones that provide them a feeling of "security"... until law enforcement arrives. Historically, most buckle at the first sign of resistance. Knowing that any number of cars in the parking lot may contain equally effective resistance can act as an effective deterrent for such cowardice.

    Secondly, citizens with CCW permits do not go through the process (including background check, finger-printing, endorsements, etc) to *hurt* people. They do it to help protect people.

    * - I'll fully admit this may be considered a long-shot, though I would argue its less of a long-shot than your hypothetical disgruntled Dilbert turning his "hunting gun" into a weapon of mass murder, While my example would require an individual to *return* to the scene they just fled, that is EXACTLY what so many of our former soldiers and law enforcement officers, now living regular lives in regular jobs, have been trained to do. I'm not an odds-maker, but I'll gladly wager that ANY sampling of Indiana employees will contain more folks of THAT variety (ready, willing, and courageous enough to protect their fellow man), than the emotionally weak/disturbed cowards capable of causing headlines by inflicting the indiscriminate damage we've read about in headlines.

    Put more faith in your fellow Hoosier. Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


  • What Federal Law?
    What federal law is this company talking about? I am not aware of any federal law that prohibits the state law that was passed.
  • Guns
    It is still amazing that all of the things this state needs to deal with and the politians moved this law to passage without listening to employers in the state. How long before an upset or recently fired employee goes to his/her car, retrieves his "hunting gun" and starts firing. Mitch and the rest will have blood on there hands.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

    2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

    3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

    4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

    5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?