IBJNews

Endocyte pulls trigger on European drug submission

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Endocyte Inc. will submit its ovarian cancer drug EC145 for European market approval in the third quarter of this year after the European Commission granted it orphan drug status, the company announced Tuesday.

The submission means West Lafayette-based Endocyte could have its first commercial product as early as 2013.

It has been nearly a year since European regulators first indicated to Endocyte that they would be willing to consider EC145 for market approval as an “orphan drug,” which meant they would accept a submission based only on results of a Phase 2 clinical trial, rather than waiting for the results of a larger and longer Phase 3 human trial.

European regulators were willing to grant this “orphan drug” status to EC145 because large numbers of women have ovarian cancers that do not respond to typical chemotherapy treatments. And there has been no new drug approved to treat ovarian cancer in 10 years.

“Targeting patients with a high unmet medical need is a prerequisite to pursuing this regulatory path and, by any measure, these patients fit that definition,” said Endocyte CEO Ron Ellis in a prepared statement.

The European Commission also granted orphan status to an imaging agent Endocyte has developed, called EC20, which lights up ovarian tumors in women that have a genetic variation that makes them bond hungrily to folate.

That’s important because Endocyte’s drug, EC145, is a combination of a very powerful chemotherapy agent and folate, so that it enters cancerous cells but does not enter healthy cells. That allows EC145 to be more deadly to cancer, without serious side effects, than patients can tolerate with traditional chemotherapy agents.

Women with tumors most open to folate, known as FR++, have shown the best response to EC145. In fact, Endocyte released new data Tuesday from its Phase 2 clinical trial, which showed that women with FR++ tumors showed a 62-percent decrease in risk of progression of their cancer and a 52-percent improvement in overall survival rates, when compared with women receiving chemotherapy alone.

An announcement in December that EC145, when applied to women with all types of ovrian cancer, actually led to worse overall survival, sent Endocyte’s shares plunging.

Investors were also worried then because a shortage of Doxil, an ovarian cancer drug given in combination with EC145, had forced Endocyte to stop enrolling patients in its Phase 3 clinical trial. That halt violated one of the prerequisities for Euopean approval of EC145, which sparked fears that EC145 would be significantly delayed before reaching market.

The Doxil shortage issue was solved earlier this month when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration allowed imports of the drug from Europe.

“After discussions with EU health authorities about Phase 3 trial plans and updated clinical data, including an updated overall survival analysis, we are pleased to move forward with these applications,” Ellis said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT